Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41657933›Full record

ArticleGMS journal for medical education2026

How to design a Q-sample: A seven-step approach based on interview data.

Nana Jedlicska, Sabrina Lichtenberg, Pascal O Berberat, Kristina Schick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GMS journal for medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nana JedlicskaTechnical University of Munich, TUM School of Medicine & Health, Department Clinical Medicine, TUM Medical Education Center, Munich, Germany.
Sabrina LichtenbergTechnical University of Munich, TUM School of Medicine & Health, Department Clinical Medicine, TUM Medical Education Center, Munich, Germany.
Pascal O BerberatTechnical University of Munich, TUM School of Medicine & Health, Department Clinical Medicine, TUM Medical Education Center, Munich, Germany.
Kristina SchickTechnical University of Munich, TUM School of Medicine & Health, Department Clinical Medicine, TUM Medical Education Center, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent decades, medical education research has increasingly investigated the subjectivity and viewpoints of (pre-service) healthcare professionals. A promising approach for exploring subjectivity is Q-methodology (Q). Q, which combines qualitative and quantitative methods, involves a card-sorting process in which participants are asked to sort statements into a (normal distribution) grid according to their preferences. Similar sorting patterns are then summarized into profiles and described narratively. A central element of this process is the design of the Q-sample - a set of statements representing a wide range of opinions, beliefs, or perspectives on the subject of study. The Q-sample is, therefore, critical for the success of a Q-study and requires precise development steps. Currently, these steps are only preliminarily described in the literature. The present paper addresses this gap by defining a seven-step approach to Q-sample design based on interview data. It offers a systematic and methodological approach that captures the diversity of viewpoints on a particular research topic. Building on a previous qualitative study, it demonstrates how to translate interview data into a Q-sample while ensuring coverage and balance through the use of a mapping technique. The paper also addresses the significance of editing and how to preserve the everyday language of participants when modifying the Q-sample to facilitate self-reference. A comprehensive overview of the criteria for designing a Q-sample is provided. Practical recommendations for selecting a Q-sample and implementing Q-methodology in medical education are offered, and potential challenges are discussed in detail.

Indexed as

Interviews as TopicResearch DesignEducation, MedicalHumansQualitative Researchdesigning Q-sampleediting Q-samplemeasuring subjectivityphysicians’ role expectationsQ-methodology

Identifiers

PMID41657933
PMCPMC12875056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.