Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41657925›Full record

ArticleGMS journal for medical education2026

An educational psychology perspective on health sciences education research.

Evelyn Steinberg, Matthias Stadler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GMS journal for medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Evelyn SteinbergUniversity of Veterinary Medicine, Vice-rectorate for study affairs, Vienna, Austria.
Matthias StadlerLMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Institute for Medical Education, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The focus of educational research has shifted from teaching to learning. Psychological theories and methods on student learning are increasingly used in health sciences education (HSE) research. However, applying those theories, methods and practices to HSE poses several challenges. Key statements: The first challenge relates to theoretical foundations in HSE studies. They are often inadequately described due to differences in writing conventions between psychological and medical disciplines. Moreover, HSE researchers are often trained in medical sciences but not in psychology, leading to potential misconceptions. Interdisciplinary collaboration and more thorough theoretical foundations are essential to overcoming these barriers. The second challenge is implementing effective study designs. HSE research often focuses on improving teaching within individual institutions, but generalizable results require data from multiple institutions. Additionally, HSE researchers without social science training may struggle with study design. Resources for capacity building and systematic educational research are needed, as well as establishing interinstitutional, interdisciplinary networks. The third challenge is the transfer of scientific evidence into educational practice. While it is common sense to provide evidence-based healthcare, less effort is put into providing evidence-based HSE. Quality assurance agencies and ministries can establish regulations pertaining to teacher education to enhance education. Conclusion: In conclusion, the integration of educational psychology into HSE research poses significant challenges. We need collaborative and interdisciplinary effort, incorporating thorough theoretical frameworks, supportive institutional policies, and effective study designs to address these challenges.

Indexed as

Psychology, EducationalResearchAcademiaHumanseducational psychologyhealth sciences education researchinterdisciplinary researchlearning

Identifiers

PMID41657925
PMCPMC12875048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.