ArticleJournal of chemical education2025
Designing Biochemical Visual Literacy Assessments: Insights from Classroom Testing and Student Interviews.
Article in Journal of chemical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A critical skill that biochemistry students must develop is the interpretation of molecular images, ranging from macromolecular representations to the chemical structures of the building blocks that comprise them. Such analysis requires biomolecular visual literacy, which is not often explicitly taught, and can be challenging for instructors to assess. In this work, we examine student responses to assessments designed to probe biomolecular visual literacy. Analysis of sets of assessments with classical test theory indicates that items which have undergone an iterative validation process, including expert review, perform well in classroom testing. However, the evaluation of multiple-choice and multiple-select assessment items based on classroom testing alone has limitations. Therefore, semistructured student interviews were used to explore student approaches to molecular visualization problem solving. Qualitative analysis of interview transcripts identified several common strategies among students when solving image-based questions, including relying on color in the images to answer questions, drawing on familiar terminology in the prompt, and using process-of-elimination to identify the best answer. Image complexity was identified as a common challenge for students. Instructors can craft more effective assessments by paying careful attention to the use of color in images, using terminology students are familiar with, carefully creating distractors, and using images with complexity appropriate to the learner level. This work underscores the importance of the student perspective in the design of assessments used by educators to evaluate learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.