Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41657917›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical education2025

Designing Biochemical Visual Literacy Assessments: Insights from Classroom Testing and Student Interviews.

Kristen Procko, Josh T Beckham, Roderico Acevedo, Swati Agrawal, Shane Austin, Charmita Burch, Shelly Engelman, Kristin M Fox, Lauren A Genova, Pamela S Mertz and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Kristen ProckoDepartment of Molecular Biosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0195-9048
Josh T BeckhamFreshman Research Initiative, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1998-3970
Roderico AcevedoChemical & Physical Sciences Department, Westfield State University, Westfield, Massachusetts 01086, United States.
Swati AgrawalBiology Department, University of Mary Washington, Fredericksburg, Virginia 22401, United States.
Shane AustinDepartment of Biological and Chemical Sciences, The University of the West Indies Cave Hill Campus, Bridgetown, Saint Michael 11000, Barbados.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8698-6055
Charmita BurchDepartment of Natural Sciences, University of Maryland Eastern Shore, Princess Anne, Maryland 21853, United States.
Shelly EngelmanCustom EduEval LLC, Austin, Texas 78749, United States.
Kristin M FoxDepartment of Chemistry, Union College, Schenectady, New York 12308, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2890-2738
Lauren A GenovaDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware 19716, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6594-2398
Pamela S MertzDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, St. Mary's College of Maryland, St. Mary's City, Maryland 20686, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9121-7613
Rachel M Mitton-FryDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Denison University, Granville, Ohio 43023, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1679-957X
Didem Vardar-UluDepartment of Chemistry, Boston University College of Arts & Sciences, 590 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3793-0124

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A critical skill that biochemistry students must develop is the interpretation of molecular images, ranging from macromolecular representations to the chemical structures of the building blocks that comprise them. Such analysis requires biomolecular visual literacy, which is not often explicitly taught, and can be challenging for instructors to assess. In this work, we examine student responses to assessments designed to probe biomolecular visual literacy. Analysis of sets of assessments with classical test theory indicates that items which have undergone an iterative validation process, including expert review, perform well in classroom testing. However, the evaluation of multiple-choice and multiple-select assessment items based on classroom testing alone has limitations. Therefore, semistructured student interviews were used to explore student approaches to molecular visualization problem solving. Qualitative analysis of interview transcripts identified several common strategies among students when solving image-based questions, including relying on color in the images to answer questions, drawing on familiar terminology in the prompt, and using process-of-elimination to identify the best answer. Image complexity was identified as a common challenge for students. Instructors can craft more effective assessments by paying careful attention to the use of color in images, using terminology students are familiar with, carefully creating distractors, and using images with complexity appropriate to the learner level. This work underscores the importance of the student perspective in the design of assessments used by educators to evaluate learning.

Indexed as

Amino acidsBiochemistryCarbohydratesChemical Education ResearchMolecular ModelingMolecular RecognitionNucleic Acids/DNA/RNAProblem Solving/Decision MakingProteins/PeptidesTesting/AssessmentUpper-Division Undergraduate

Identifiers

PMID41657917
PMCPMC12879067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.