Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41657871›Full record

ReviewCureus2026

Musculoskeletal Disorders, Healthy Buildings, and the Hotel Industry: A Narrative Review and Critical Reflection.

Ezequiel D Gherscovici, John M Mayer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ezequiel D GherscoviciResearch and Development, Healthy Buildings LLC, Malibu, USA.
John M MayerResearch and Development, Healthy Buildings LLC, Malibu, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) continue to be problematic globally. Numerous guideline-based management approaches have been advocated for MSDs, but long-term recovery is elusive. Thus, innovations should be explored to help mitigate the adverse consequences of these disorders. The objective of this paper was to provide a narrative literature review and critical reflection of MSDs and healthy buildings in the hotel industry. Searches of the peer-reviewed medical literature (via PubMed) and hospitality literature (via SCImago) were conducted for MSDs, healthy buildings, and hotels. The available evidence from the searches was synthesized and critically examined, and research and implementation recommendations were proposed. Key findings include the available evidence displays a substantial risk of bias, and numerous gaps in knowledge and research exist at the aggregate interface of MSDs, healthy buildings, and hotels; hotel workers appear to be particularly vulnerable to MSDs, yet interventions are needed to address MSDs in this occupational setting; and interventions delivered in luxury resort hotels may be useful for guests with MSDs. This paper is the first known attempt to critically examine the new field intersecting MSDs, healthy buildings, and the hotel industry. In consideration of the limited available evidence, it offers recommendations for medical and hotel stakeholders to advance the field through scientifically sound research and implementation efforts. If positive findings are observed in future initiatives, a new healthcare value proposition is created, with the desired outcome of mitigating MSDs and improving the health, wellness, quality of life, and experiential takeaway of hotel employees and guests.

Indexed as

delivery of health carehealthy buildingshotelsmusculoskeletal disordersoccupational health

Identifiers

PMID41657871
PMCPMC12875603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.