Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41657852›Full record

ArticleJournal of nursing management2026

The Impact of Magnet Recognition on Nurse Managers' Assessments of Work Environment, Quality, and Safety: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Hyunmin Yu, Luke J Keele, Heather Brom, Helena Pittman, Roopa Varghese, Matthew D McHugh, Linda H Aiken

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nursing management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hyunmin YuCenter for Health Outcomes and Policy Research, School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA, upenn.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6770-0808
Luke J KeeleDepartment of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA, upenn.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3859-2713
Heather BromCenter for Health Outcomes and Policy Research, School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA, upenn.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4295-6372
Helena PittmanDepartment of Nursing, Penn Presbyterian Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Roopa VargheseDepartment of Regulatory Affairs, Temple Health, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-3649-0306
Matthew D McHughCenter for Health Outcomes and Policy Research, School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA, upenn.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1263-0697
Linda H AikenCenter for Health Outcomes and Policy Research, School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA, upenn.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8004-3630

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Nurse managers are central to hospital operations, yet little is known about how organizational factors, such as Magnet Recognition by the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), shape their assessments of the work environment, care quality, and safety. This study examined whether Magnet status is associated with nurse managers' assessments of these domains. Methods: This cross-sectional study used data from the 2024 Penn Nurses4All Survey, the 2023 American Hospital Association Annual Survey, and the ANCC's list of Magnet-recognized organizations. The sample included 1362 nurse managers from 771 hospitals across 10 U.S. states (450 in 186 Magnet hospitals and 912 in 585 non-Magnet hospitals). Outcomes included managers' assessments of the work environment, nursing care quality, patient safety, and hospital recommendation. Approximate balancing weights were applied to adjust for hospital- and manager-level covariates, and weighted linear probability models estimated average treatment effects. Results: Magnet managers were more likely to hold graduate degrees and to work in large, teaching, and not-for-profit hospitals. Compared with non-Magnet managers, they were 9 percentage points more likely to rate the work environment as excellent or good ( Conclusion: Magnet status was associated with more favorable assessments of the work environment, quality, and safety among nurse managers. These findings suggest that Magnet structures may strengthen organizational environment and culture across multiple levels of the nursing workforce.

Indexed as

CredentialingNurse AdministratorsQuality of Health CareWorkplaceAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansJob SatisfactionMaleMiddle AgedPatient SafetySurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesWorking ConditionsMagnet hospitalsnurse managerspatient safetyquality of health carework environment

Identifiers

PMID41657852
PMCPMC12877956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.