ArticleFoot & ankle orthopaedics2026
Percutaneous Zadek Osteotomy and Sural Nerve Proximity: A Cadaveric Anatomical Mapping Study.
Article in Foot & ankle orthopaedics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The Zadek osteotomy, a dorsal closing-wedge procedure of the calcaneus, is commonly used in the surgical treatment of insertional Achilles tendinopathy, particularly in patients unresponsive to conservative measures. Although minimally invasive surgical (MIS) techniques offer potential benefits such as reduced soft tissue trauma and faster recovery, concerns persist regarding the risk of iatrogenic injury to the sural nerve because of limited visualization. This cadaveric study aims to provide a detailed anatomical assessment of the sural nerve and its branches in relation to the entry point of the MIS Zadek osteotomy, with the goal of quantifying their proximity and offering data that may help reduce the risk of nerve injury during the procedure. Methods: Twenty fresh-frozen human lower limb specimens were subjected to a standardized MIS Zadek osteotomy using a 3 × 30-mm Shannon burr. The osteotomy was guided fluoroscopically and performed through a lateral percutaneous approach. Post-procedure, meticulous anatomical dissections were conducted to identify the sural nerve and measure its distance from the anterior and posterior arms of the osteotomy using digital calipers with 0.1-mm precision. Measurements were independently recorded by 2 observers to ensure accuracy. Results: The sural nerve was successfully identified in all specimens. No instances of sural nerve transection or gross anatomical disruption were observed. The mean distance from the osteotomy to the sural nerve was 11.95 mm, with a range of 8.3 to 15.4 mm and an SD of 2.18 mm. These findings suggest that when performed within the defined anatomical parameters, the MIS Zadek osteotomy maintains a safe distance from the sural nerve. Conclusion: In our cadaver study, we found that the MIS Zadek osteotomy maintained a mean distance of 11.95 mm from the sural nerve. These findings define anatomical proximity; clinical safety requires prospective validation. Clinical Relevance: Our study defines a reproducible anatomical margin for MIS Zadek osteotomy; clinical safety needs prospective validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.