ReviewFrontiers in psychology2025
The role of cognitive control affects memory encoding: evidence from subsequent memory paradigm.
Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Memory and cognitive control are fundamentally intertwined, but their interactions have only recently attracted researcher attention and the underlying mechanism of the interactions remains to be further explored. Several theoretical explanations for the influence of cognitive control on memory encoding include common-resource account, interactive model, and stage-specific encoding account. Specifically, common-resource account advocates that cognitive control sub-components compete for limited cognitive resources during memory encoding. Interactive model highlights the importance of selective attention and stage-specific encoding account emphasizes specific processing stage where cognitive control plays a role in memory encoding. By combing the existing literature, we found that different cognitive control sub-components exert differential effects on memory encoding. In other words, cognitive control can either enhance or impair memory encoding depending on the specific task demands and context. Firstly, compared to trials in which the current task is the same as the preceding task (repetition trials), the trials where current task is different from the preceding task (switch trials) will impair the memory encoding of target stimuli and enhance the memory encoding of distractor. Secondly, inhibition can facilitate memory encoding solely when the interference detecting from competing stimuli (i.e., Stroop task) rather than from stimulus and response (i.e., Simon task). Thirdly, both proactive and reactive inhibition possess the possibility to impair memory encoding. Future research could delve into this phenomenon from the perspective of exploring how multiple cognitive control integration influences memory encoding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.