ArticlePreventive medicine reports2026
HPV detection in first void urine and cervicovaginal samples: comparative study and analysis of associated factors in women from tunja, colombia.
Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To compare Human Papillomavirus (HPV) detection in first-void urine (FVU) and cervicovaginal samples and to analyze factors associated with cervicovaginal HPV infection among women in Tunja, Colombia. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 161 women aged 20-65 years residing in Tunja, Colombia. Samples and data were collected between September and November 2022 in a clinical laboratory. Cervicovaginal and FVU samples were obtained for HPV genotyping using the INNO-LiPA HPV Genotyping Extra II kit. Concordance, sensitivity, specificity, and associations with sociodemographic and gynecological variables were evaluated. Crude and adjusted odds ratios (OR) were estimated using logistic regression. Results: HPV prevalence was 29.19% in cervicovaginal samples and 32.91% in urine samples. Genotypes 52 and 68 were the most frequent in both sample types. Concordance between tests was weak (kappa = 0.39). Sensitivity and specificity of urine-based detection were 61.70% and 78.94%, respectively. In the multivariable model, only pregnancy history remained independently associated with cervicovaginal HPV infection. Conclusions: HPV infection prevalence was moderate, with high-risk genotypes detected in both sample types. The history of pregnancy was the only independent factor associated with cervicovaginal HPV infection. HPV detection in urine showed limited diagnostic performance, highlighting the need to optimize urine screening strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.