ReviewPreventive medicine reports2026
Reimagining primary health care: a historical and contemporary scoping review of community-based primary health care models and innovations.
Review in Preventive medicine reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Community-driven type 2 diabetes prevention in primary healthcare: a mixed-methods pre-post intervention study in Thailand.BMC primary care · 2026Article
- Community health volunteers as a frontline platform for antimicrobial resistance mitigation in sub-Saharan Africa: A scoping review.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
- Community engagement strategies for antimicrobial resistance control and interventions.BMJ public health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Community-based primary health care (CBPHC) has long underpinned health service delivery in resource-limited settings. However, demographic shifts, increasing chronic disease burdens, and digital transformations challenge its sustainability. This review synthesizes historical and contemporary evidence on CBPHC to assess effectiveness, identify limitations, and outline future directions toward universal health coverage (UHC). Methods: Using the Arksey and O'Malley framework, we conducted a scoping review of global literature from 1975 to 2025 across PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and grey sources. Data were thematically analyzed into categories capturing evolution, achievements, challenges, and future directions. Results: A total of 134 documents were reviewed. CBPHC improved access to essential services, particularly maternal and child health, infectious disease control, and health promotion. Programs led by community health workers and volunteers strengthened systems but faced persistent barriers such as attrition, limited funding, and weak integration. Case studies from Nepal, Ethiopia, Brazil, and Rwanda showed improved maternal and child outcomes and pandemic preparedness and resilience. Emerging challenges include syndemics, demographic shifts, and urbanization. Conclusions: CBPHC remains vital for advancing universal health coverage. Its sustainability depends on evolving into a diagonally integrated, people-centered, and digitally enabled model supported by equitable investment in governance, workforce training, and community engagement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.