ArticleAmerican journal of cancer research2026
Analysis of the efficacy and postoperative complications of thoracoscopic resection through the transthoracic posterior approach of thoracic paravertebral dumbbell-shaped schwannoma.
Article in American journal of cancer research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aim to compare the clinical efficacy and postoperative complications total incidence rates of the thoracoscopic resection through the trans-thoracic posterior approach thoracic paravertebral dumbbell-shaped schwannoma with the traditional posterior median approach, in order to provide a reference for clinical treatment. This study was a retrospective cohort study. A total of 265 patients with thoracic paravertebral dumbbell-shaped schwannoma in our hospital from January 2020 to December 2024 were retrospectively included as the research subjects. According to the actual surgical method received, patients were divided into the experimental group (n=130) and the control group (n=135). The patients in the experimental group received thoracoscopic resection through the transthoracic posterior approach, while the patients in the control group received traditional posterior median approach. All patients were followed up for 12 months, 24 months, and 36 months after surgery. The baseline data, primary outcome indicator (total incidence rate of postoperative complications), and secondary outcome indicators (surgical basic conditions, degree of surgical resection, pathological results, and changes in patient efficacy indicators throughout the follow-up period, and total recurrence rate of thoracic paravertebral dumbbell-shaped schwannoma) were compared and analyzed between the experimental group and the control group. The total incidence rate of complications in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.