ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Differential musculoskeletal outcome reporting in patients receiving bempedoic acid or atorvastatin: a disproportionality analysis using the EudraVigilance database.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is a major risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Statins are the first choice LDL-C-lowering drugs, but often associated with musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs), limiting adherence. Bempedoic acid (BA) is a newer LDL-C-lowering prodrug acting upstream of statins with limited muscle tissue activation, offering an alternative to statin-intolerant patients. However, recent evidence suggests a higher-than-expected rate of muscle-related adverse drug reactions (ADRs). This study compares muscle-related ADRs for BA and atorvastatin (ATO) using the European spontaneous reporting system. Methods: ADRs reports were extracted from the earliest available date to 30 June 2024 and categorized by patient demographics and ADR type. Disproportionality analysis via Reporting Odds Ratios (RORs) was performed to assess differences in muscle-related ADRs between BA and ATO. Results: A total of 78,930 ADR reports, respectively 2,667 for BA-only, 76,137 for ATO-only and 126 for coadministration, were analysed. MSDs were the most frequently reported events, significantly higher in BA-only than ATO-only recipients (ROR 2.25, 95% CI 2.08-2.43). Musculoskeletal and muscle discomfort showed the highest odds of association with BA (6.97, 95% CI 4.46-10.91 and 6.37, 95% CI 4.58-8.85, respectively). Conversely, more severe conditions such as creatine phosphokinase increase (ROR 0.44, 95% CI 0.34-0.57) and rhabdomyolysis (ROR 0.05, 95% CI 0.02-0.10) were more frequently reported for ATO-only recipients. Overall, muscle-related ADRs reported for BA showed lower severity. Conclusion: Using a Registry-based approach, we found increased odds of muscle-related ADR reports in BA recipients compared to ATO, although characterized by more favourable clinical outcomes. It is suggested to pay increased attention to consider drug-related causes of muscle symptoms when BA is used, particularly when in combination with statins.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.