ArticleHand therapy2026
Current rehabilitation for adults with peripheral nerve injuries in the UK: An online survey.
Article in Hand therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Peripheral nerve injuries can lead to paralysis, sensory loss, chronic pain, and profound psychological and vocational consequences. Recent UK guidelines recommend biopsychosocial rehabilitation, yet qualitative evidence suggest gaps in service provision. This study explored current rehabilitation and perceived barriers among therapists treating adults with peripheral nerve injuries. Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was distributed to UK physiotherapists and occupational therapists experienced in upper and lower limb peripheral nerve injury rehabilitation. Questions captured demographics, treatment strategies before and after reinnervation, access to psychological support, and perceived organisational barriers. Descriptive analysis was undertaken. Results: Fifty-three respondents (60% physiotherapists, 40% occupational therapists) completed the survey; 70% had more than 10 years' experience. Ninety eight percent of respondents treated adults with upper limb nerve injuries. Motor and sensory interventions (active and passive range of motion, splinting, strength training, and functional activity) were reported as "always/frequently" used by >80% of respondents. Over a quarter of respondents (28%) occasionally/rarely used pain neuroscience education. Other specific psychological interventions including cognitive behavioural techniques and mindfulness were rarely used (<30% always/frequently). Over half respondents reported no outpatient access to clinical psychology. Organisational barriers included limited time, funding, skilled staff, and absence of local guidelines. However, 83% believed therapists could deliver more psychologically informed care. Conclusions: UK rehabilitation for adults with peripheral nerve injuries remains predominantly biomedical, with limited integration of psychologically informed care and limited access to Clinical Psychology. Addressing systemic barriers and evaluating digital or hybrid models may enable more biopsychosocial, patient-centred care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.