Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41657748›Full record

ArticleJournal of hand surgery global online2026

Perioperative Treatment of Neuropathic Pain (Nerve SPACE 2025).

Adam Mosa, Neill Y Li, Alexander Chamessian, Lara W Crock, Catherine M Curtin, Allan Belzberg, Sarah Buday, Bryan J Loeffler, Christopher Janney, Mark A Mahan and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of hand surgery global online, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Adam MosaDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Neill Y LiDuke University School of Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Durham, NC.
Alexander ChamessianWashington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Department of Anesthesiology, St. Louis, MO.
Lara W CrockWashington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Department of Anesthesiology, St. Louis, MO.
Catherine M CurtinDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford Medical Center, Stanford, CA.
Allan BelzbergDepartment of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Sarah BudayWashington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Department of Anesthesiology, St. Louis, MO.
Bryan J LoefflerOrthoCarolina Hand Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC.
Christopher JanneyUnited Brachial Plexus Network, Reading, MA.
Mark A MahanDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
Amy M MooreDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuropathic pain following brachial plexus and peripheral nerve injury represents one of the most debilitating and least effectively treated sequelae of nerve trauma. Where are we now?: Neuropathic pain affects a majority of patients with severe nerve injuries and is frequently more disabling than associated motor or sensory deficits. The current scientific understanding implicates maladaptive peripheral and central nervous system changes, including neuroma formation, nociceptor hyperexcitability, central sensitization, and cortical reorganization. Contemporary management relies on multimodal strategies incorporating rehabilitation, pharmacotherapy, psychological support, neuromodulation, and select surgical interventions; however, most patients experience only partial or temporary relief, underscoring the persistent gap between mechanistic insight and durable clinical benefit. Where do we need to go?: There remains a critical need for more effective, durable, and patient-centered approaches to neuropathic pain. Improved stratification tools, including biologic, imaging, and electrophysiologic biomarkers, are required to guide personalized treatment selection. Existing preclinical models inadequately capture the psychosocial and functional dimensions of pain, limiting translational relevance. Future therapies must better integrate biological, technological, and psychosocial domains while prioritizing pain relief as an outcome equal in importance to motor and sensory recovery. How do we get there?: Progress will depend on multidisciplinary collaboration that aligns surgical innovation, targeted pharmacologic therapies, neuromodulation technologies, and structured psychological support. One target for growth in the field will be establishing multicenter registries and consensus-built outcome measures, which will be essential to evaluate real-world effectiveness and inform best practices. Continued refinement of biologically rational surgical strategies, emerging neuromodulation platforms, and integrative rehabilitation tools offer a pathway toward care models that address both pain and function. Meaningful improvements in quality of life for patients with nerve injury-related neuropathic pain may be achieved.

Indexed as

Chronic painMultimodal analgesiaNeuropathic painPeripheral nerve surgery

Identifiers

PMID41657748
PMCPMC12874565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.