ArticleJournal of hand surgery global online2026
Perioperative Treatment of Neuropathic Pain (Nerve SPACE 2025).
Article in Journal of hand surgery global online, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Surgical Neurolysis for Atypical Neuropathy Diagnosed via Physical Examination Significantly Improves Chronic Pain Despite Negative Workup.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neuropathic pain following brachial plexus and peripheral nerve injury represents one of the most debilitating and least effectively treated sequelae of nerve trauma. Where are we now?: Neuropathic pain affects a majority of patients with severe nerve injuries and is frequently more disabling than associated motor or sensory deficits. The current scientific understanding implicates maladaptive peripheral and central nervous system changes, including neuroma formation, nociceptor hyperexcitability, central sensitization, and cortical reorganization. Contemporary management relies on multimodal strategies incorporating rehabilitation, pharmacotherapy, psychological support, neuromodulation, and select surgical interventions; however, most patients experience only partial or temporary relief, underscoring the persistent gap between mechanistic insight and durable clinical benefit. Where do we need to go?: There remains a critical need for more effective, durable, and patient-centered approaches to neuropathic pain. Improved stratification tools, including biologic, imaging, and electrophysiologic biomarkers, are required to guide personalized treatment selection. Existing preclinical models inadequately capture the psychosocial and functional dimensions of pain, limiting translational relevance. Future therapies must better integrate biological, technological, and psychosocial domains while prioritizing pain relief as an outcome equal in importance to motor and sensory recovery. How do we get there?: Progress will depend on multidisciplinary collaboration that aligns surgical innovation, targeted pharmacologic therapies, neuromodulation technologies, and structured psychological support. One target for growth in the field will be establishing multicenter registries and consensus-built outcome measures, which will be essential to evaluate real-world effectiveness and inform best practices. Continued refinement of biologically rational surgical strategies, emerging neuromodulation platforms, and integrative rehabilitation tools offer a pathway toward care models that address both pain and function. Meaningful improvements in quality of life for patients with nerve injury-related neuropathic pain may be achieved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.