Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41657745›Full record

ArticleJournal of hand surgery global online2026

Ongoing Clinical Challenges in Nerve Surgery (Nerve SPACE 2025).

Katherine M Gerull, David M Brogan, Harvey Chim, Bryan J Loeffler, Megan M Jack, Robert J Spinner, Macyn M Stonner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of hand surgery global online, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Katherine M GerullDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis. St. Louis, MO.
David M BroganDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis. St. Louis, MO.
Harvey ChimDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA.
Bryan J LoefflerReconstructive Center for Lost Limbs, OrthoCarolina Hand Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Atrium Healthcare, Charlotte, NC.
Megan M JackDepartment of Neurosurgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
Robert J SpinnerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Macyn M StonnerMilliken Hand Rehabilitation Center, Program in Occupational Therapy, Washington University in St. Louis. St. Louis, MO.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Where are we?: There have been numerous advances over the last decade in peripheral nerve surgery and rehabilitation following nerve transfers. In particular, advances in nerve allografts, nerve wraps, peripheral nerve sheath tumor treatment, and bionic limb technology have expanded the therapeutic landscape for patients with nerve injuries, tumors, and limb loss. Rehabilitation strategies have improved significantly, largely through advances such as the Donor Activation Focused Rehabilitation Approach. Nerve allografts show promise for short digital nerve gaps, though outcomes for proximal injuries remain controversial. Nerve wraps and connectors are widely available, but their efficacy has been controversial, perhaps due to heterogeneity in materials and limited high-quality research studies. In peripheral nerve sheath tumors, molecular subtyping has improved classification, yet reliable preoperative distinction between benign and malignant tumors remains a challenge. Bionic limb reconstruction has been improved through advances in targeted reinnervation, osseointegration, and myoelectric control, although prosthetic abandonment, phantom limb pain, and high costs remain barriers. Where do we need to go?: Future progress requires rigorous empirical evidence to define effective rehabilitation protocols, clarifying the role of allografts versus autografts and determining the clinical utility of nerve wraps and connectors. Improved diagnostic tools are necessary for accurate tumor characterization, and novel systemic therapies are needed for malignant tumors with poor survival outcomes. In bionic limb reconstruction, future advances should integrate intuitive prosthetic control, sensory feedback, and improve pain management while ensuring equitable access to these technologies. How do we get there?: Achieving these goals will require multicenter, nonconflicted, randomized clinical trials; the development of standardized outcome measures; and investment in translational research across cellular biology, imaging, and device development. Collaborative interdisciplinary research is critical to developing evidence-based protocols and technologies. Together, these strategies can continue to accelerate our understanding of peripheral nerve injury, disease, and rehabilitation.

Indexed as

Bionic limb reconstructionNerve allograftNerve injury rehabilitationNerve wrapsPeripheral nerve sheath tumors

Identifiers

PMID41657745
PMCPMC12874579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.