ReviewFrontiers in surgery2025
Robotics total knee arthroplasty: is an image-based the only solution?
Review in Frontiers in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Radiographic accuracy of implant positioning in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, does an imageless robotic system make a difference?Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2026Article
- Transferability of robotic surgical proficiency across platforms in knee replacement: analysis of the early learning curve in an experienced surgeon.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) significantly enhances surgical precision and alignment accuracy. While traditional robotic systems rely on preoperative imaging, imageless technology has emerged as a viable alternative, leading to a reduction in costs, radiation exposure, and logistical challenges. This narrative review aims to evaluate the efficacy and reliability of imageless robotic-assisted TKA, specifically assessing its accuracy in component positioning, functional outcomes, and potential advantages over image-based systems. A review of current literature was conducted, comparing imageless robotic TKA with both manual and image-based techniques. The key parameters analyzed include alignment precision, joint line restoration, patient-reported outcomes, and complication rates. Notably, imageless robotic-assisted TKA demonstrated alignment accuracy and functional outcomes comparable to those of image-based systems, while providing enhancements in workflow efficiency and the elimination of radiation exposure. Although a moderate learning curve was observed, no significant differences in patient satisfaction or clinical performance were recorded. Overall, imageless robotic-assisted TKA represents a safe and effective alternative to image-based systems, achieving comparable surgical precision with additional economic and practical benefits. Further research is required to confirm long-term outcomes and to optimize intraoperative guidance strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.