ArticleAfrican journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence2026
Rural-urban disparities in Emergency Medical Services: a qualitative study of barriers and opportunities in Rivers State, Nigeria.
Article in African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Emergency Medical Services (EMS) are critical for reducing morbidity and mortality in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), yet significant disparities persist between urban and rural areas. This qualitative study explores barriers and opportunities in EMS utilisation among residents of Rivers State, Nigeria. Methods: Using a hybrid deductive-inductive approach guided by the Levesque framework for healthcare access, we conducted a focus group discussion with 20 purposively selected stakeholders representing nine categories, including healthcare providers, policymakers, community leaders and EMS users. Data was analysed thematically to identify barriers and opportunities in EMS utilisation. Results: Analysis revealed systemic barriers across five dimensions: accessibility (delayed response times, poor communication), acceptability (cultural beliefs favouring faith-based interventions), availability (inadequate infrastructure and staffing), affordability (high out-of-pocket costs), and appropriateness (gender and mental health disparities). These challenges were more pronounced in rural areas where they faced more compounded barriers, including geographic isolation and limited ambulance coverage. Several opportunities for improvement emerged, including community first-responder training, technology integration (e.g., GPS tracking), and multi-level collaborations, both inter-agency and with local non-governmental organisations (NGOs). Conclusion: The findings underscore the urgent need for policy reforms to decentralise EMS management, enhance public awareness, and address socioeconomic inequities. This study contributes to the discourse on healthcare disparities in LMICs and provides actionable recommendations for stakeholders to strengthen EMS systems in Nigeria through multi-sectoral collaboration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.