Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41657721›Full record

ArticleCurrent research in food science2026

Systematic evaluation and comparison of the

Paleerath Peerapen, Pattaranit Putpeerawit, Wanida Boonmark, Visith Thongboonkerd

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current research in food science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Paleerath PeerapenMedical Proteomics Unit, Research Department, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand.
Pattaranit PutpeerawitMedical Proteomics Unit, Research Department, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand.
Wanida BoonmarkMedical Proteomics Unit, Research Department, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand.
Visith ThongboonkerdMedical Proteomics Unit, Research Department, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Kidney stone disease (KSD), particularly calcium oxalate (CaOx) type, remains a global health problem. Many efforts have been made to prevent KSD, including the use of some dietary supplements. However, mechanisms underlying their anti-KSD properties have remained poorly understood, and their relative anti-KSD properties have previously been unknown. Herein, we systematically evaluated and compared the inhibitory effects of five well-known dietary supplements on CaOx crystals. Caffeine (CAF), epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG), N-acetylcysteine (NAC), resveratrol (RES) and trigonelline (TRIG) (at 1, 10 and 100 μM, which are within their physiologic levels in the urine) were subjected to CaOx crystallization, growth and aggregation assays. Degrees of their CaOx crystal-inhibitory activities were then compared. CAF inhibited crystal formation, EGCG inhibited crystal formation and growth, NAC inhibited crystal aggregation, RES inhibited crystal growth, and TRIG inhibited crystal formation and growth. However, RES promoted crystal aggregation and thus served as a dual modulator (acting as an inhibitor and promoter at different steps of stone formation). Almost all of these inhibitory effects were concentration-dependent. Comparing the CaOx-inhibitory activities of these compounds revealed that EGCG was the most potent inhibitor against CaOx crystal formation (with the crystal abundance-inhibitory activity of 85.61 ± 5.12 %), whereas RES was the most potent inhibitor against CaOx crystal growth (with the crystal growth-inhibitory activity of 92.99 ± 1.67 %). NAC was the only inhibitor against CaOx crystal aggregation (with the crystal aggregation-inhibitory activity of 22.97 ± 0.75 %). These data indicate the direct inhibitory effects of various dietary supplements against CaOx crystal formation, growth and aggregation, supporting their roles in KSD prevention.

Indexed as

CaffeineEpigallocatechin-3-gallateN-acetylcysteineNephrolithiasisResveratrolTrigonelline

Identifiers

PMID41657721
PMCPMC12877853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.