Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41657709›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of innovations in cardiac rhythm management2026

Artificial Intelligence-driven Detection, Mapping, and Personalized Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation.

Daniel Joseph Gonzalez, Samhith Kambampati, Erick Godinez, Ishan Paranjpe, Kushal Chatterjee, Rahul Devathu, Aaryamaan Verma, Emma Sun, Connie Ma, Muhammad Fazal and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of innovations in cardiac rhythm management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Daniel Joseph GonzalezDepartment of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Samhith KambampatiDepartment of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Erick GodinezDepartment of Medicine, University of Nevada-Reno School of Medicine, Reno, NV, USA.
Ishan ParanjpeDepartment of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Kushal ChatterjeeDepartment of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Rahul DevathuDepartment of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Aaryamaan VermaDepartment of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Emma SunDepartment of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Connie MaDepartment of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Muhammad FazalDepartment of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Tina BaykanerDepartment of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Atrial fibrillation (AF), the most common arrhythmia worldwide, affects approximately 59 million people globally. It poses a significant health burden by increasing morbidity and mortality. Artificial intelligence (AI) is emerging as a potentially transformative technology across the AF care continuum. This review synthesizes current evidence and critically evaluates AI applications in AF management, including innovations in detection and screening using electrocardiography and wearables; advanced mapping techniques using signal processing and computational modeling to guide catheter ablation; machine learning-based prediction of treatment outcomes; and personalization of long-term therapy, such as anticoagulation. Key studies and trials illustrating AI's capabilities in improving diagnostic yield, refining ablation targets, and enhancing prognostic accuracy are analyzed. The potential for AI to facilitate integrated care pathways, such as the "AF Better Care" approach, is considered, balancing innovation against clinical practicality, rigorous validation, and workflow integration. While AI shows considerable potential to augment precision in AF management, significant challenges concerning data generalizability, model interpretability, clinical utility validation, and equitable implementation remain. Optimal integration requires careful alignment with clinical expertise and a focus on patient-centric outcomes. Addressing these challenges through collaborative efforts among clinicians, researchers, and technology developers will be essential to fully realize AI's promise in improving AF care. Future research should prioritize robust validation, transparent methodologies, and practical implementation strategies to ensure that AI effectively enhances patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceatrial fibrillationcatheter ablation

Identifiers

PMID41657709
PMCPMC12880197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.