ReviewThe Journal of innovations in cardiac rhythm management2026
Artificial Intelligence-driven Detection, Mapping, and Personalized Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation.
Review in The Journal of innovations in cardiac rhythm management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- AI-Driven Atrial Fibrillation Management: From Signal to Strategy.Balkan medical journal · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Atrial fibrillation (AF), the most common arrhythmia worldwide, affects approximately 59 million people globally. It poses a significant health burden by increasing morbidity and mortality. Artificial intelligence (AI) is emerging as a potentially transformative technology across the AF care continuum. This review synthesizes current evidence and critically evaluates AI applications in AF management, including innovations in detection and screening using electrocardiography and wearables; advanced mapping techniques using signal processing and computational modeling to guide catheter ablation; machine learning-based prediction of treatment outcomes; and personalization of long-term therapy, such as anticoagulation. Key studies and trials illustrating AI's capabilities in improving diagnostic yield, refining ablation targets, and enhancing prognostic accuracy are analyzed. The potential for AI to facilitate integrated care pathways, such as the "AF Better Care" approach, is considered, balancing innovation against clinical practicality, rigorous validation, and workflow integration. While AI shows considerable potential to augment precision in AF management, significant challenges concerning data generalizability, model interpretability, clinical utility validation, and equitable implementation remain. Optimal integration requires careful alignment with clinical expertise and a focus on patient-centric outcomes. Addressing these challenges through collaborative efforts among clinicians, researchers, and technology developers will be essential to fully realize AI's promise in improving AF care. Future research should prioritize robust validation, transparent methodologies, and practical implementation strategies to ensure that AI effectively enhances patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.