Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41657701›Full record

Observational studyFrontiers in public health2026

Budget impact analysis of deep brain stimulation devices with different longevity in Parkinson's disease: insights from real-world data.

Mariachiara Sensi, Pietro Antenucci, Fabiana Colucci, Andrea Gozzi, Jay Guido Capone, Chiara Angelini, Fatima Waheed, Michele Alessandro Cavallo, Alba Scerrati

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mariachiara SensiNeurology Department, Arcispedale Sant'Anna Hospital, Ferrara, Italy.
Pietro AntenucciNeurology Department, Arcispedale Sant'Anna Hospital, Ferrara, Italy.
Fabiana ColucciClinical Neurology Unit, Department of Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Andrea GozziNeurology Department, Arcispedale Sant'Anna Hospital, Ferrara, Italy.
Jay Guido CaponeNeurology Department, Arcispedale Sant'Anna Hospital, Ferrara, Italy.
Chiara AngeliniNeurosurgery Unit, Arcispedale Sant'Anna, Ferrara, Italy.
Fatima WaheedNeurosurgery Unit, Arcispedale Sant'Anna, Ferrara, Italy.
Michele Alessandro CavalloNeurosurgery Unit, Arcispedale Sant'Anna, Ferrara, Italy.
Alba ScerratiNeurosurgery Unit, Arcispedale Sant'Anna, Ferrara, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a viable treatment option for Parkinson's disease (PD) based on modulation of brain networks by electrical stimulation powered by implantable pulse generators (IPGs). Commercially available IPGs are either rechargeable (R) or non-rechargeable (NR). A budget impact analysis was developed to compare costs of the two options in PD-DBS patients, focusing on avoided battery replacements, associated complications, hospitalization rates. Methods: The study was conducted in two phases: an observational, single-center, retrospective analysis from 2005 to 2023 of 94 PD-DBS patients, followed by a second phase in which the economic data obtained were used to build a budget impact analysis (BIA) comparing the two different options. Results: Data from 47 PD-DBS patients with NR and 47 with R-IPGs were examined. BIA was calculated on a single patient with a 15-year and 25-year R-IPG. The higher initial cost of R devices compared with NR devices is offset by the absence of device replacements. This results in an estimated savings of €38,333 per patient with a 15-year R-IPG and €71,584 with a 25-year IPG. Conclusions: BIA predicts that the cost savings with a long-lasting R-IPG up to 25 years is cost effective compared with NR, regardless of age and life expectancy.

Indexed as

BudgetsDeep Brain StimulationParkinson DiseaseAgedCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective Studiesdeep brain stimulationeconomic evaluationimplantable pulse generatorParkinson diseasereal world evidence

Identifiers

PMID41657701
PMCPMC12876242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.