ArticleKorean journal of neurotrauma2026
Validation of the Korean Moss Attention Rating Scale in Traumatic Brain Injury: Reliability and Validity.
Article in Korean journal of neurotrauma, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Letter to the Editor: Commentary on Validation of the Korean Moss Attention Rating Scale in Traumatic Brain Injury: Reliability and Validity (Korean journal of neurotrauma · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to translate the Moss Attention Rating Scale (MARS) into Korean and to validate the psychometric properties of the Korean version (K-MARS) in inpatients with moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury (msTBI). Methods: A prospective, single-center study was conducted, recruiting 51 patients with traumatic brain injury between 2023 and 2024. The K-MARS was translated using a standardized cross-cultural adaptation method. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were also evaluated. Additional assessments of cognitive function, sleep quality, and mood were conducted to examine the convergent validity. Results: The K-MARS demonstrated strong internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and convergent validity. Cronbach's alpha for the total score was 0.870, and intra-class correlation coefficients for test-retest reliability exceeded 0.90 for both the total score and all subscales. Significant correlations were observed between the K-MARS total score and overall cognitive performance, as well as with several attention-related measures, including the Trail Making Test and Digit Span Test. Conclusion: The K-MARS is a psychometrically reliable and valid tool for assessing attention-related behaviors in Korean inpatients with msTBI. By capturing behaviorally observable attention deficits, the K-MARS helps identify individual attentional problems and guides the development of tailored cognitive rehabilitation plans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.