Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41657627›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2025

Sunita Chaudhary, Preeti Bhadouria, Deepak Tomar, Meenakshi Singh Tomar, Rushit Patel, Amit Kumar Upadhyay

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sunita ChaudharyDepartment of Prosthodontics, DJ College of Dental Sciences and Research, Modinagar, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Preeti BhadouriaDepartment of Oral Medicine & Radiology, Maharana Pratap college of Dentistry & Reasearch Centre, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Deepak TomarDepartment of Orthodontics, Ram Krishna Dharmarth Foundation Dental College and Research Centre Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Meenakshi Singh TomarDepartment of Prosthodontics, Ram Krishna Dharmarth Foundation Dental College and Research Centre Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Rushit PatelDepartment of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Karnavati School of Dentistry, Karnavati University, Gandhinagar, Gujrat, India.
Amit Kumar UpadhyayDepartment of Periodontology, Shri Balaji Institute of Dental Sciences, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The biomechanical stability of implant-abutment connections is influenced by abutment screw head design. Therefore, it is of interest to compare fracture resistance, deformation and torque loss among hexagonal, star-shaped and conical screw head interfaces. Forty-five titanium assemblies were loaded axially until failure and outcomes were analyzed with ANOVA and Tukey's test. Conical screws showed significantly higher fracture resistance, lower deformation and better preload retention than other designs (p < 0.001). Thus, we show that conical interface screws provide superior mechanical stability under compressive forces.

Indexed as

abutment screwcompressive forceDental implantsIn vitro studymechanical strengthscrew head design

Identifiers

PMID41657627
PMCPMC12880168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.