ArticleBioinformation2025
Assessing sagittal discrepancies using beta angle, ANB angle and WITS appraisal: A cephalometric study.
Article in Bioinformation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Styloid Process Elongation as an Incidental Finding in Adult Orthodontic Patients: Prevalence, Morphology and Diagnostic Implications from Panoramic Radiography.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is a need to evaluate the reliability and applicability of various cephalometric tools used for assessing sagittal discrepancies in patients with Class I, II, and III skeletal patterns. Therefore, it is of interest to assess sagittal discrepancies in patients with Class I, II, and III skeletal patterns by comparing three common diagnostic tools: the beta angle, ANB angle and Wits appraisal. Hence, a total of 120 subjects, divided into three groups based on their skeletal pattern, were evaluated using lateral cephalograms. Statistical analyses showed significant differences in beta angle measurements between the groups. The beta angle was found to provide a more consistent assessment of sagittal jaw relationships than the ANB angle and Wits appraisal, especially in cases with jaw rotations or occlusal plane changes. Thus, we show the beta angle as a valuable tool for orthodontic diagnosis, offering greater reliability in assessing skeletal relationships. Further research with larger samples and different populations is recommended to validate these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.