Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41657599›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2025

Long-term outcomes of minimally invasive versus open partial nephrectomy: A multi-center retrospective analysis.

Navaneeth Ranjith, Malavika Sajeev, Shanmukha Koppolu, Jonathan Roy Varghese, Satya Sudhakara Bhat, Kishore Sekar, Omar Imtiaz Usmani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Navaneeth RanjithDepartment of Urology, Caritas hospital, Kottayam, Kerala, India.
Malavika SajeevDepartment of Emergency Medicine, East Sussex NHS healthcare Trust, Eastbourne, United Kingdom.
Shanmukha KoppoluDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Barts NHS Trust, London, England, United Kingdom.
Jonathan Roy VargheseDepartment of General Medicine, TMBBS, Tirunelveli Medical College, Tirunelveli, Tamil Nadu, India.
Satya Sudhakara BhatDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Lancashire, UK.
Kishore SekarDepartment of General Surgery, Queens Hospital, London, Romford, United Kingdom.
Omar Imtiaz UsmaniDepartment of General Medicines, MBBS-Intern, Era's Lucknow Medical College, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Minimally invasive partial nephrectomy (MIPN) has become a preferred method over open partial nephrectomy (OPN) for treating localized renal tumors. This multi-center retrospective study examines the long-term oncological and renal functional outcomes of MIPN compared to OPN. Data from five tertiary centres were reviewed over a decade. Data indicates that while oncological control is similar for both methods, MIPN provides superior renal preservation and fewer complications. Thus, we show MIPN as a safe and effective long-term alternative to OPN.

Indexed as

laparoscopic surgerynephron-sparing surgeryPartial nephrectomyrenal cell carcinomarobotic surgery

Identifiers

PMID41657599
PMCPMC12880141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.