Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41657594›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2025

Effect of multiparametric MRI and ultrasound-guided biopsy for early prostate cancer detection: A prospective cohort study.

Deepika Karunakaran, Holebasu Ballur, Archana Abarnadevi Karthikeyan, Satya Sudhakara Bhat, Kausalya Perumalsamy, Anannya Vaibhavi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Deepika KarunakaranDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University Hospitals of Morecambe Bay, NHS Trust, United Kingdom.
Holebasu BallurDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University Hospitals of Morecambe Bay, NHS Trust, United Kingdom.
Archana Abarnadevi KarthikeyanDepartment of HPB Surgery, Kings College Hospital, London, England, United Kingdom.
Satya Sudhakara BhatDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom.
Kausalya PerumalsamyDepartment of Pediatrics, Resident Medicla Officer, Kauvery Hospital, Tirunelveli, Tamil Nadu, India.
Anannya VaibhaviDepartment of Physiology, RML hospital, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is essential to detect clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) in an early and precise manner. However, there are challenges given that the usual TRUS-guided biopsy may leave tumors undiagnosed, or only detect indolent disease. In this prospective cohort study of 200 patients, we compared the diagnostic accuracy of multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) with TRUS-guided biopsy. The study found better sensitivity (91% vs 68%) and specificity (76% vs 60%) than TRUS biopsy, and identified 22% more clinically significant cancers than TRUS biopsies. In addition, mpMRI showed better positive predictive value and negative predictive value than TRUS-guided biopsy; this suggests general advantage in diagnostic accuracy and performance for mpMRI. Data shows, there is support for mpMRI having improved efficacy as a method of detecting clinically significant prostate cancer early compared to TRUS-guided biopsy.

Indexed as

magnetic resonance imagingMultiparametric MRIprostate cancerUSG biopsy

Identifiers

PMID41657594
PMCPMC12880121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.