ArticleBioinformation2025
Assessment of biomimetic materials in strengthening root canal-treated teeth during orthodontic intrusion or extrusion.
Article in Bioinformation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The biomechanical function of teeth with endodontic treatment is directly impacted by the restorative material chosen. It has been demonstrated that biomimetic restorative techniques, such as fiber-reinforced composites, polyethylene fibre reinforcement, and bioactive core materials, more successfully mimic the functional characteristics of natural dentin and enamel than traditional composites. Therefore, it is of interest to evaluate the strengthening effect of biomimetic restorative materials on root canal-treated teeth subjected to orthodontic intrusion and extrusion. Forty extracted maxillary premolars were restored using short fibre-reinforced composite, polyethylene fibre with composite, biodentine, or conventional composite, and tested under 150 g orthodontic force. Teeth restored with fibre-based materials exhibited significantly higher fracture resistance than biodentine and control groups (p < 0.05). Favorable fracture patterns predominated in fibre-reinforced groups, while conventional composites showed mainly unfavorable fractures. Biomimetic restorations, particularly fibre-based materials, enhance fracture resistance and promote favorable failure modes during orthodontic loading.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.