Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41657589›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2025

AI for diagnosing malocclusions from 3D dental models.

Imad Mohammed, Subash Chandra Nayak, Vasim Akram Shaik, Akshaya Raj, Murshida Pulayakalathil, Sreejith Karattuparambil Karunakaran

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Imad MohammedDepartment of Orthodontics, Cmai Medical Center, Uthman bin afan road, Al falah Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Subash Chandra NayakDepartment of Hi- tech Dental College and Hospital, Odisha, India.
Vasim Akram ShaikDepartment of Orthodontist, Orthodontic Navodaya Dental College, Raichur, Karnataka, India.
Akshaya RajDepartment of Educare Institute of Dental Sciences, Malappuram, Kerala, India.
Murshida PulayakalathilDepartment of Educare Institute of Dental Sciences, Malappuram, Kerala, India.
Sreejith Karattuparambil KarunakaranDepartment of Prosthodontist, Divya Jyoti College of Dental Sciences and Research, Modinagar, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India 201204.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate diagnosis of dental malocclusions remains challenging due to interobserver variability among orthodontists. Therefore, it is of interest to evaluate the diagnostic reliability of artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms in classifying malocclusion types using 3D dental models compared with expert orthodontist assessments. A convolutional neural network (CNN) was trained and tested on digital impressions, and its performance was statistically analyzed against expert diagnoses. Results demonstrated strong agreement between AI predictions and orthodontist evaluations with clinically relevant consistency. These findings highlight the potential of AI-assisted diagnostics to enhance accuracy and reduce subjectivity in orthodontic assessment.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencedeep learningdigital impressionsMalocclusionorthodontic diagnosis

Identifiers

PMID41657589
PMCPMC12880146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.