Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41657587›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2025

Mechanical properties of thermoformed and 3D-printed aligners after cleansing solution exposure: An

Diksha Vinod Wali, Shashank Sharad Gaikwad, Vilasrao Kadam, Parag Vishnu Gangurde, Nityanand Shankar Shetty, Chinmay Mahale, Prakash Sarkar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Diksha Vinod WaliDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be) University Dental College and Hospital, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Shashank Sharad GaikwadDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be) University Dental College and Hospital, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Vilasrao KadamDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Bharati Vidyapeeth's College of Pharmacy, Mumbai University, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Parag Vishnu GangurdeDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be) University Dental College and Hospital, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Nityanand Shankar ShettyDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be) University Dental College and Hospital, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Chinmay MahaleDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be) University Dental College and Hospital, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Prakash SarkarDepartment of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, Institute National Institute of Technology (NIT), Jamshedpur, Jharkhand, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The impact of common cleaning solutions on the mechanical properties of clear orthodontic aligners made from PET-G, polyurethane and resin-based materials is of interest. Nanoindentation tests measured elastic modulus, hardness, elastic index and load relaxation after exposure to Retainer Brite®, Fresh Guard® and artificial saliva. The results showed that peroxide-based cleaners significantly degrade aligner properties, while Fresh Guard® causes moderate changes and artificial saliva has minimal effects. Resin-based aligners showed superior chemical stability, making them more resistant to cleaning agents. Thus, mild cleaners are recommended for maintaining aligner performance.

Indexed as

Elastic modulusfresh guard®load relaxationorthodontic alignersretainer brite®

Identifiers

PMID41657587
PMCPMC12880138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.