Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41657578›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2025

Efficacy and safety of fractional CO

Jianfeng Zhang, Mengke Wu, Cong Liu, Xiaochen Zhu, Qin Guo, Cheng Tan

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jianfeng Zhang *Department of Dermatology, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Jiangsu Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.
Mengke Wu *Department of Dermatology, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Jiangsu Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.
Cong LiuDepartment of Dermatology, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Jiangsu Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.
Xiaochen ZhuDepartment of Dermatology, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Jiangsu Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.
Qin GuoDepartment of Dermatology, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Jiangsu Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.
Cheng TanDepartment of Dermatology, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Jiangsu Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This study aims to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of fractional CO Materials and methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the combination therapy of fractional CO₂ laser and TA injection for HS were identified through systematic searches of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang, Sinomed, and VIP databases from inception to December 2024. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias tool. Meta-analysis was performed with RevMan (version 5.3), while sensitivity analysis and publication bias assessment were conducted using Stata (version 14.0). The quality of evidence for outcomes was evaluated with the Grades of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) assessment. Results: Nineteen studies involving 1,775 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with TA injection alone, the pooled results showed that fractional CO₂ laser combined with TA injection significantly reduced Vancouver Scar Scale scores [MD: -2.52, 95% CI: -3.07 to -1.98, Conclusion: Preliminary evidence suggests that fractional CO₂ laser combined with TA injection is an effective treatment for HS. However, due to methodological limitations in the included studies, large-scale, rigorously designed RCTs are required to validate these findings. Additionally, all 19 RCTs were conducted in China with Chinese participants; therefore, the current evidence is limited to this population and requires validation in other ethnic groups. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42025630116, identifier PROSPERO (CRD4202563011).

Indexed as

fractional CO₂ laserhypertrophic scarmeta-analysisrandomized controlled trialstriamcinolone acetonide

Identifiers

PMID41657578
PMCPMC12872559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.