ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
CerevianNet: parameter efficient multi-class brain tumor classification using custom lightweight CNN.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Brain Tumor Segmentation and Grading on MRI Using Deep Learning: A Systematic Literature Review and Benchmark-Driven Comparative Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Brain tumors are a life-threatening condition, and their early detection is crucial for effective treatment and improved survival rates. Traditional manual evaluation techniques, such as expert radiologist assessments and visual inspections, are widely used for diagnosing brain tumors. While these methods can be highly reliable, they are often time-consuming, prone to human error, and challenging to scale for large datasets. Consequently, there is a growing demand for Computer-Aided Diagnostic (CAD) systems to overcome these limitations and deliver fast, accurate, and scalable solutions. Despite these promising advancements, the study highlights potential limitations, including susceptibility to overfitting due to the limited availability of labeled data and the need for extensive hyperparameter tuning to generalize across diverse datasets. This study proposes a scalable multi-class brain tumor classification framework optimized for small-form-factor devices. We introduced a novel, lightweight custom convolutional neural network (CNN) that maintains high classification accuracy while significantly reducing computational complexity. We evaluated the model's capacity by training and testing it on five different datasets, and it performed well on all five. We observed a significant improvement in performance with the model on larger datasets, but it struggled with smaller and imbalanced datasets. We achieved significant scores on the datasets, and we had the highest testing accuracy on Dataset-5 (99.67% training accuracy, 98.17% validation accuracy, and 98.30% testing accuracy). What is important to note is that we had the lowest testing accuracy on Dataset-3 (99.99% training accuracy, 74.11% validation accuracy, and 75.63% testing accuracy). The proposed framework leverages state-of-the-art pretrained deep learning models, including EfficientNetb3, ResNet-101, ResNet-50, Xception, AlexNet, DenseNet121, Swin Transformer, and our custom lightweight CNN model. Experimental evaluations demonstrate that EfficientNetb3 achieves the highest accuracy of 99.11%, while the custom lightweight CNN attains 98% accuracy with 4.1 × fewer parameters and reduced training time. These results highlight the effectiveness of computer-aided approaches in achieving near-expert performance, making them suitable for integration into clinical workflows. This research paves the way for deploying efficient and scalable deep learning models in real-world medical applications, thereby expanding accessibility to accurate brain tumor diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.