Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41657563›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in medicine2025

From first generation to the next: evolution and research trends in iStent technology.

Bryan Chin Hou Ang, Natalie Shi Qi Wong, Bjorn Betzler, Sheng Yang Lim

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bryan Chin Hou Ang *Department of Ophthalmology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, National Healthcare Group Eye Institute, Singapore, Singapore.
Natalie Shi Qi Wong *Department of Ophthalmology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, National Healthcare Group Eye Institute, Singapore, Singapore.
Bjorn BetzlerDepartment of Ophthalmology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, National Healthcare Group Eye Institute, Singapore, Singapore.
Sheng Yang LimDepartment of Ophthalmology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, National Healthcare Group Eye Institute, Singapore, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The iStent series constitutes a range of trabecular bypass minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) devices, which offers intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction with favourable safety profiles, in patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG). Having undergone significant evolution since its initial US FDA-approval in 2012, successive generations address previous limitations, while enhancing IOP-lowering efficacy through device and delivery system design iterations. Longer-term and real-world iStent data demonstrate the durability of IOP- and medication-lowering outcomes with minimal complications, while preliminary studies across a wider spectrum of glaucoma subtypes and severities provide limited evidence of successful outcomes beyond mild-to-moderate OAG, both with and without concomitant cataract surgery. Aqueous humour outflow assessment and novel intra-operative techniques may further facilitate more accurate and effective iStent positioning. Despite typically higher upfront costs, results from both cost-effectiveness and patient-reported outcome studies are encouraging. Combination MIGS with the iStent, leveraging on the multiple mechanisms of actions of various procedures, may provide greater IOP-lowering efficacy without compromising safety. With expanding clinical data and progressive enhancements, iStent technology is likely to remain a key component of the evolving MIGS landscape.

Indexed as

glaucoma - surgeryiStentiStent injectiStent inject Wminimally invasive glaucoma surgeryprimary open angle glaucoma

Identifiers

PMID41657563
PMCPMC12875938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.