Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41657475›Full record

ArticleDementia and neurocognitive disorders2026

The Clinical Utility of the Cognitive Impairment Screening Test (CIST).

Hyeseon Han, Soyeon Lim, Suah Kim, Byung Hwa Lee, Hee Jin Kim, Juhee Chin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dementia and neurocognitive disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hyeseon HanDepartment of Neurology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-1214-3569
Soyeon LimDepartment of Neurology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-7007-909X
Suah KimDepartment of Neurology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-3155-0963
Byung Hwa LeeDepartment of Neurology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7415-8554
Hee Jin KimDepartment of Neurology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3186-9441
Juhee ChinDepartment of Neurology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3784-9716

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Purpose: The Cognitive Impairment Screening Test (CIST) was developed for use at the Community Dementia Reassurance Center in South Korea. This study evaluated convergent and discriminant validity of CIST, as well as its clinical utility in identifying cognitive impairment and differentiating amyloid deposition. Methods: We enrolled 252 participants from a hospital memory clinic (47 cognitively unimpaired [CU], 116 amnestic mild cognitive impairment, and 89 dementia). Participants completed CIST, K-MMSE-2, the Seoul Neuropsychological Screening Battery, 2nd edition (SNSB-II), and underwent amyloid positron emission tomography. To evaluate the convergent and discriminant validity of CIST, we conducted correlation analyses with SNSB-II. Receiver operating characteristic analyses were used to evaluate the ability to discriminate cognitive impairment and to distinguish amyloid positivity. Areas under the curve (AUCs) for CIST and K-MMSE-2 were compared using DeLong's test. Results: The total score of CIST correlated significantly with all SNSB-II subtests, and the domain scores of CIST showed stronger associations with corresponding SNSB-II subtests than with unrelated ones. Both CIST and K-MMSE-2 effectively distinguished cognitively impaired individuals from CU, with CIST demonstrating superior discrimination (AUC=0.926 vs. 0.887, Conclusions: The CIST demonstrated strong validity and discriminatory ability for detecting cognitive impairment. It also showed acceptable discrimination for amyloid positivity in non-demented participants, supporting its utility as a screening tool in both clinical and community settings.

Indexed as

Amyloid-BetaCISTCognitive Screening TestDementiaMild Cognitive ImpairmentSNSB-II

Identifiers

PMID41657475
PMCPMC12876441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.