ReviewTranslational pediatrics2026
Psychological impact and intervention strategies for unaccompanied patients in pediatric intensive care units: a narrative review.
Review in Translational pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: The pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) is a high-stress medical environment. Family-Centered Care (FCC), which ensures parental presence and participation, is recognized as the standard of practice to mitigate psychological distress and trauma in critically ill children. However, infection control mandates [most notably during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic] and resource limitations often necessitate restrictive visitation policies, leaving children in an "unaccompanied" state. This separation from parents constitutes a significant deviation from the standard care model and poses a unique psychological risk. A systematic synthesis of the specific psychological impacts of this parental absence and adaptive strategies to effectively intervene within this context remains underdeveloped. This narrative review aims to analyze the primary psychological consequences of parental absence for children in the PICU and to explore the intervention strategies adapted to mitigate these effects. Methods: We reviewed journal articles from the past 15 years (2010-2024) that analyze and discuss the psychological impact and intervention strategies of unaccompanied patients in pediatric intensive care units. Key Content and Findings: Our analysis indicates that an unaccompanied state is a significant, independent risk factor for psychological morbidity in PICU patients, markedly exacerbating separation anxiety, fear, loneliness, and depressive symptoms, which may also impede physiological recovery. Effective interventions must focus on mitigating the trauma of separation. The core strategy identified is "Virtual Family-Centered Care" (e.g., re-establishing family connection and participation in rounds via video technology). Other critical interventions include alternative socio-emotional support from the healthcare team (especially Child Life Specialists), professional psychological therapies, and environmental optimization to reduce threat perception. Conclusions: We conclude that while parental presence is irreplaceable, PICUs must adopt innovative interventions, particularly technology-assisted virtual connections, to protect the psychological well-being of unaccompanied children whenever visitation is necessarily restricted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.