Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41657438›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery2026

Interrelatedness of Neurocognitive Domain Functioning Between Unprompted and Prompted Identification Testing With Psychophysical Olfactory Evaluation in a Post-COVID-19 Cohort.

Jeremy P Tervo, Patricia T Jacobson, Brandon J Vilarello, Tiana M Saak, Francesco F Caruana, Liam W Gallagher, Joseph B Gary, David A Gudis, Paule V Joseph, Tse-Hwei Choo and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Jeremy P TervoDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons New York New York USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8883-8566
Patricia T JacobsonDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Yale University School of Medicine New Haven Connecticut USA.
Brandon J VilarelloDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery University of Miami Health System Miami Florida USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0305-2298
Tiana M SaakDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons New York New York USA.
Francesco F CaruanaDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA.
Liam W GallagherDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery University of Minnesota Minneapolis Minnesota USA.
Joseph B GaryDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons New York New York USA.
David A GudisDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons New York New York USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1938-9349
Paule V JosephNational Institute of Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, Section of Sensory Science and Metabolism & National Institute of Nursing Research Bethesda Maryland USA.
Tse-Hwei ChooDepartment of Psychiatry New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center New York New York USA.
Davangere P DevanandDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons New York New York USA.
Terry E GoldbergDepartment of Psychiatry New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center New York New York USA.
Jonathan B OverdevestDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons New York New York USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Assessment of olfactory function with psychophysical testing requires cognitive demand to correctly pair test odors with remembered scents. Individuals suffering from long-Corona Virus Disease 2019 (long-COVID-19) may develop a decline in neurocognitive performance, which may be concurrent with persistent olfactory dysfunction (OD). Given the rigorous cognitive demand of the unprompted identification (UI) olfactory assessment, the goal of this study is to understand whether it could serve as a proxy for specific neurocognitive domains during clinical assessment of olfaction. Methods: Participants from our long-COVID cohorts with persistent OD underwent a panel of neurocognitive screening followed by olfactory assessment of threshold followed by unprompted (UI) and prompted identification (PI) tests using Sniffin' Sticks. Hierarchical linear mixed-effect models were used to understand the relative impact of each neurocognitive variable after controlling for demographics and olfactory threshold scores. Results: Neurocognitive variables demonstrated common correlation trends. Models containing Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and digit-span backward scores had statistically significant fits for both UI (MoCA: Conclusions: UI and PI have interrelated neurocognitive dependence on global cognition (MoCA) and executive function (digit-span backward) among long-COVID participants. As UI draws upon neurocognitive domains of episodic (logical memory), semantic (verbal fluency), and working memory (digit-span forward), the inclusion of a UI task may provide supplementary screening for cognitive impairments in those undergoing clinical olfactory assessment, particularly among those with lingering effects of COVID-19.

Indexed as

long‐COVIDneurocognitionolfactionpost‐COVID conditionsmell dysfunctionunprompted identification

Identifiers

PMID41657438
PMCPMC12875845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.