ReviewNeurology. Clinical practice2026
Neuropsychiatric Features in Patients With Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Neurology. Clinical practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose of Review: Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) is a treatable condition characterized by impaired gait, cognition, and bladder function. Neuropsychiatric symptoms may be important in iNPH but are poorly understood. We report the first systematic review and meta-analysis estimating the prevalence, severity, and treatment responsiveness of neuropsychiatric symptoms and diagnoses in iNPH. We searched PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, Ovid, MEDLINE, Cochrane, and PsycINFO from inception until October 23, 2024, for peer-reviewed, original studies in adults with definite, probable, or possible iNPH that reported neuropsychiatric features using validated tools or clinician diagnosis (PROSPERO CRD42021287293). Case studies and series, as well as studies where diagnostic criteria for iNPH were unclear, were excluded. Study quality assessment and data extraction were independently performed by 2 authors, according to a proforma developed iteratively. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to pool proportions and standardized mean differences. Meta-regression, subgroup analysis, and sensitivity analysis were performed. Recent Findings: Twenty-two studies were included, of which 1 was a randomized-controlled trial. For our primary outcome, we found a high prevalence of apathy (69.2%, 95% CI 63.1-74.6, n = 293) and depression (30.1%, 20.1-42.3, n = 7,670) in iNPH. Agitation (22.6%, 11.8-39.1), anxiety (21.9%, 13.2-34.2), disinhibition (21.0%, 11.8-34.7), and psychotic syndromes (8.0%, 3.3-18.3) were relatively less prevalent. Depression scores were higher in patients with iNPH than in controls (Hedge's g 1.31, 0.39-2.23). Treatment of iNPH was associated with a reduction in depression scores (-0.30, -0.62 to 0.01), although the confidence interval contained the null. A total of 12 of 22 studies were rated 'low' quality. Summary: Apathy and depression are highly prevalent in iNPH, maybe more so than in other neurodegenerative conditions. Little is known about other neuropsychiatric features in iNPH. Treatment of iNPH may reduce neuropsychiatric symptoms, particularly depression. However, our study was limited by heterogeneity in populations and assessment tools and a lack of baseline data on neuropsychiatric symptoms before iNPH diagnosis. These findings highlight the urgent need for further research into neuropsychiatric features in iNPH, their mechanisms, and their potential response to treatment.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.