ArticleThe Laryngoscope2026
Fluorescence Guidance Reduces Operative Time for Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in the Head and Neck.
Article in The Laryngoscope, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivePrior studies have demonstrated the feasibility of fluorescently labeled tilmanocept for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in the oral cavity. We evaluated the added value of fluorescently labeled tilmanocept in sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) of the oral cavity compared to gamma probe.
methodsHealthy male New Zealand white rabbits received oral cavity injections of radioactive (Technetium 99m) and fluorescently (IRDye800) conjugated tilmanocept followed by either fluorescence guided (n = 14) or gamma probe guided (n = 14) SLNB performed 1 h, 48 h, or 5 days postinjection. Duration of the SLNB performed by two individuals was measured and compared using the two methods.
resultsFluorescence guidance resulted in a 1.8-fold reduction in time of SLN removal (median 104 vs. 191 s, p = 0.05). For the fluorescence guided SLNB, 7.1% (1 of 14) had nonsentinel node tissue removed prior to the correct identification of the SLN, whereas gamma probe/radioactivity guided SLNB had 28.6% (4 of 14). When comparing operation time between attending and resident surgeon, time to identification of first SLN was not significantly different for fluorescence guided surgery (82 vs. 107 s, respectively) or with gamma probe (158 vs. 204 s); however, median times using the gamma probe were nearly double for both operators. We additionally show the durability of fluorescence signal up to 5 days and clear visualization of proposed tracer with commercially available intraoperative imagers.
conclusionThe use of fluorescent labeled tilmanocept decreases operative time needed for SLNB as well as reduces the amount of nonsentinel tissue removed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.