ArticleNeurourology and urodynamics2026
Automated Ultrasound-Based Analysis of Urethral Kinematics in Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Pilot Study.
Article in Neurourology and urodynamics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mechanically-induced fiducial marker system for event-based synchronization of independent recording instruments.Measurement science & technology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesStress urinary incontinence (SUI) has been linked to excessive urethral mobility, yet clinical evaluation has been largely limited to assessing maximal excursion rather than capturing the full dynamics of visible urethral movement. In this study, we hypothesize that an automated, ultrasound-based method can objectively differentiate urethral mobility patterns between women with SUI and continent controls.
methodsWe used a previously validated optical flow-based algorithm to automatically track urethral motion from transperineal ultrasound images during cough, Valsalva maneuver, and pelvic muscle contraction (PMC) in 11 women with SUI and 10 continent controls. Urethral motion was assessed by defining three regions of interest along the urethra (proximal, mid, and distal). Segmental urethral kinematics were computed and statistically compared between groups.
resultsSubstantial variability and overlap between groups were observed, with coefficient of variation ranging 25%-90%. On average, women with SUI demonstrated significantly larger urethral displacement compared to controls, particularly at the proximal segment during Valsalva (10.6 ± 1.2 mm vs. 6.0 ± 0.6 mm, p < 0.01), with pronounced inferior-posterior motion. Additionally, displacement between the upper and lower urethra was significantly larger in the SUI group (0.47 ± 0.10 mm/mm vs. 0.13 ± 0.03 mm/mm, p < 0.05), indicating localized hypermobility particularly near the proximal urethra. Maneuver-specific differences were also noted within the SUI group, with Valsalva producing significantly larger and less uniform urethral movements compared to cough (10.6 ± 1.2 mm vs. 6.6 ± 0.5 mm, p < 0.05).
conclusionOur results demonstrate that the automated method is capable of capturing urethral mobility characteristics associated with SUI. Significant inter-individual variability in both continent and SUI groups indicates that urethral kinematics are heterogeneous. The detailed kinematic data have the potential to identify distinct sub-types of urethral mobility, facilitating systematic comparisons with underlying structural and neuromuscular defects. This approach can move clinical evaluation from simple group comparisons toward personalized SUI diagnosis and targeted treatment selection. Future studies with larger sample sizes and inclusion of additional pelvic floor conditions will be needed to validate these findings and advance their translation into clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.