ArticleJournal of sleep research2026
iSPHYNCS: Unsupervised Clustering in Questionnaires and Metadata Reveals Distinct Subtypes in the Narcolepsy Borderland.
Article in Journal of sleep research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04330963 (International Swiss Primary Hypersomnolence and Narcolepsy Cohort Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
International Swiss Primary Hypersomnolence and Narcolepsy Cohort Study
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Machine Learning for Diagnosis and Differentiation of Central Disorders of Hypersomnolence: A Systematic Review.European journal of neurology · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The international Swiss Primary Hypersomnolence and Narcolepsy Cohort Study (iSPHYNCS) is a multicentre study aimed at identifying novel biomarkers for central disorders of hypersomnolence (CDH). We analysed questionnaires and metadata to uncover distinct clusters of participants and explore phenotypic variability within CDH. Data were collected from 227 patients with CDH and 33 healthy controls. Participants completed validated clinical questionnaires and study-specific questions addressing CDH-related symptoms such as excessive daytime sleepiness, fatigue, cataplexy, disrupted sleep, and sleep paralysis. Demographic metadata (age, gender, BMI) were included. After excluding participants with missing over 30% of data (n = 40), missing values were imputed using a multiple random forest algorithm. A robust clustering pipeline was employed: (1) random sampling of 60% of the dataset, (2) dimensionality reduction via UMAP, (3) K-means clustering, and (4) consensus clustering across 500 iterations. Post hoc analysis was performed to identify biomarkers in data not used for clustering. We identified four distinct clusters. One predominantly comprised healthy controls, while another primarily contained individuals with narcolepsy type 1 (NT1). Two clusters represented predominantly the narcolepsy borderland group (NBL), with one distinctly characterised by higher symptom severity and psychiatric comorbidities. The clustering pipeline produced reproducible results, with the NT1 and healthy control clusters serving as internal validation. The differentiation between the two NBL clusters aligns with prior studies, suggesting a possible NBL subtype marked by increased fatigue and psychiatric comorbidities. These findings emphasise the phenotypic heterogeneity of CDH and the potential for cluster-based approaches in management. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04330963.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.