ReviewNanoscale2026
Non-traditional granular magnetoresistive devices: a short review.
Review in Nanoscale, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Over the past decade, thin-film-based magnetoresistive (MR) sensors have undergone significant advancements. These conventional rigid thin-film MR sensors provided high sensitivity and reliability but were limited by their mechanical rigidity and incompatibility with curved or wearable surfaces. To address this flexibility issue, later flexible MR sensors were achieved by thinning or transferring the active layers of rigid sensors onto compliant substrates, which enabled strain-tolerant operation and integration with soft electronic platforms. However, these devices still relied on conventional film-based geometries that were restricted by the high fabrication costs, complexity, and poor scalability. Non-traditional granular MR sensors have emerged as a promising direction in spintronics research owing to their cost-effective fabrication, structural simplicity, and compatibility with flexible and wearable electronics. Despite these advantages, several challenges remain, particularly the need to enhance their sensitivity for low magnetic field detection, such as biomagnetic fields. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of to-date reported non-traditional granular MR devices, their physical mechanisms, material configurations, fabrication strategies, and MR device performance evolution over the past two decades. We highlighted how advances in nanoparticle engineering, insulating matrices, and polymeric binders have expanded the potential of granular MR systems for next-generation flexible and printable magnetoelectronic applications.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.