Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41657192›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science & technology2026

Cradle-to-Grave Lifecycle Analysis of U.S. Medium- and Heavy-Duty Vehicle-Fuel Pathways: A Greenhouse Gas Emissions Assessment of Current (2021) and Future (2035) Technologies.

Jarod C Kelly, Amgad Elgowainy, Ram Vijayagopal, Matteo Muratori, Ian Sutherland, Hoseinali Borhan, Hyung Chul Kim, Marcus Alexander

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science & technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jarod C KellyEnergy Systems and Infrastructure Analysis Division, Argonne National Laboratory, 9700 S. Cass Avenue, Lemont, Illinois 60439, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7804-6506
Amgad ElgowainyEnergy Systems and Infrastructure Analysis Division, Argonne National Laboratory, 9700 S. Cass Avenue, Lemont, Illinois 60439, United States.
Ram VijayagopalEnergy Systems and Infrastructure Analysis Division, Argonne National Laboratory, 9700 S. Cass Avenue, Lemont, Illinois 60439, United States.
Matteo MuratoriPacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington 99352, United States.
Ian SutherlandGeneral Motors Research and Development, 30470 Harley Earl Blvd, Warren, Michigan 48092, United States.
Hoseinali BorhanCummins Technical Center, Cummins Inc, 1900 McKinley Avenue, Columbus, Indiana 47201, United States.
Hyung Chul KimResearch and Innovation Center, Ford Motor Company, Dearborn, Michigan 48124, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0992-4547
Marcus AlexanderElectric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, California 94304, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study presents a cradle-to-grave lifecycle analysis of energy use and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions for U.S. medium- and heavy-duty vehicles across current (2021) and future (2035) technologies using the Greenhouse gas, Regulated Emissions, and Energy use in Technologies (GREET) model with industry-vetted assumptions. Results vary across vehicle classes but point to common trends: today, battery electric vehicles (BEVs) offer significant (10-60%) GHG emissions reduction compared to diesel internal combustion engine vehicles and are the lowest emissions option per ton-mile of cargo movement, followed by hydrogen fuel cell electric vehicles (FCEVs) (5-50% emissions reduction). Emissions savings depend largely on the duty cycle and fuel economy of the vehicle type. Future vehicle technology advancements result in comparable emission reductions associated with BEVs and hydrogen FCEVs. Weight-limited BEV trucks see less per-ton-mile emissions reduction due to the impact of battery weight on increased vehicle weight and reduced payload capacity. By 2035, improvements in vehicle efficiency can reduce emissions across all powertrains. However, very low levels of emissions require switching vehicles' use-phase fuel/energy to low-carbon fuels and electricity. Renewable diesel, e-fuels, hydrogen produced from natural gas with carbon capture and storage or renewables, and use of low-carbon electricity can all achieve over 70% reduction in GHG emissions from the current day diesel-based internal combustion engine vehicle.

Indexed as

Greenhouse GasesVehicle EmissionsAir PollutantsMotor VehiclesUnited StatesAir PollutantsGreenhouse GasesVehicle Emissionsalternative fuelsalternative powertrainsheavy duty vehicleslifecycle analysismedium duty vehicles

Identifiers

PMID41657192
PMCPMC12947617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.