ArticleArthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.)2026
Serum Proteomic Signatures of Rheumatoid Arthritis Risk and Response: Analysis of a Rheumatoid Arthritis Interception Trial.
Article in Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveOur study objective was to identify serum protein signatures associated with progression to rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and response to abatacept in at-risk individuals.
methodsA total of 440 serum samples from 118 APIPPRA (Arthritis Prevention In the Preclinical Phase of RA with Abatacept) study participants were selected from baseline to RA onset for 46 progressors of RA or to study end for 72 participants who did not develop RA. Samples were analyzed using the SomaScan 7k assay platform. Differential expression analysis was assessed by progression to RA (three pre-RA time intervals to RA, progressors of RA vs nonprogressors, baseline to RA), and by treatment allocation (abatacept vs placebo). Risk and response signatures were identified in the full 7k panel and two prespecified subpanels defined as Inflammatory Mediators and Adaptive Immune Cell panel.
resultsWe observed significant changes in 80 proteins (68 down-regulated and 12 up-regulated) occurring between RA onset and 6 to 24 months before developing disease. Progression to RA was associated with increased levels of acute-phase reactants SAA1 and SAA2 and reductions in CTLA4, when compared to nonprogressors at the end of treatment. Two up-regulated proteins (CTLA4 and CD86) and seven down-regulated proteins (CXCL13, FCRL4, FCER2, CCL21, LTA|LTB, FDCSP, and IL22RA2) were observed in participants receiving abatacept compared to placebo regardless of RA outcome.
conclusionProtein signatures dominated by acute-phase proteins define progression to RA, whereas changes associated with abatacept therapy highlight potential mechanisms of treatment response. Such signatures provide a better understanding of the immune landscape of the at-risk phase, opening up the possibility of new treatment modalities for RA prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.