SynthesisSexual and reproductive health matters2025
Abortion stigma amongst the public in high-income countries: a mixed-method systematic review.
Synthesis in Sexual and reproductive health matters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The public plays a central role in producing and sustaining abortion stigma by shaping dominant narratives, reinforcing moral norms, and passing judgment on individuals associated with abortion. These collective attitudes are expressed through social exclusion and symbolic condemnation - practices that shape both personal experiences and structural access to care. This mixed-methods systematic review updates the state of research by synthesising recent evidence from high-income countries (HICs), with particular focus on how the public enact and experience abortion stigma. We conducted a mixed-methods systematic review of peer-reviewed quantitative and qualitative studies published since 2015, following international standards for systematic reviews. Due to heterogeneity in measurement, quantitative and qualitative data were narratively synthesised. Methodological quality was assessed using standardised appraisal tools for both quantitative and qualitative research. Nineteen studies were included (12 qualitative, 7 quantitative). Quantitative findings reveal that abortion stigma in HICs persists at moderate levels and is associated with religiosity, political conservatism, lower income, and male gender. Qualitative studies demonstrate how stigma is enacted, perceived, and anticipated across diverse social settings, highlighting prevailing stereotypes and uncovering experiences of verbal harassment and social exclusion. Abortion stigma remains deeply embedded within the public. By updating and expanding on the previous work, this review underscores the need for targeted, group-specific stigma reduction strategies and more robust instruments for capturing stigma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.