Cost-effectiveness of risk-stratified screening for cervical cancer in cohorts vaccinated against human papillomavirus with moderate vaccination coverage.

Cervical cancer screening in the Netherlands consists of human papillomavirus (HPV) testing followed by cytological triage at age 30, 35, 40, 50, and 60 years. Women are also invited at age 45, 55 and 65 years if they did not test HPV-negative 5 years earlier (risk-based invitation). With influx of birth cohorts vaccinated against HPV, de-intensification may be needed to maintain a cost-effective program. We used an updated and recalibrated model of type-specific HPV transmission and cervical carcinogenesis to estimate the cost-effectiveness of 16 strategies with reduced screening intensity. Strategies varied by starting age, screening interval, and number of risk-based invitations, possibly stratified for HPV vaccination status. Cost-effectiveness was measured by net monetary benefit (NMB). A positive NMB indicates that a strategy is cost-effective compared to the current policy. Two strategies without stratification for HPV vaccination status had a positive NMB. An NMB of EUR 1.6 million per 100,000 women was obtained when, compared to current screening, the invitation at age 35 was based on the HPV-test result at age 30. An NMB of EUR 1.8 million per 100,000 women was obtained when women were re-invited every 5 years if they were HPV-positive or had not been tested 5 years earlier. If reduced screening was only applied to vaccinated women, the highest NMB was EUR 1.3 million per 100,000 women. Thus, reducing screening in HPV-vaccinated cohorts is cost-effective when re-inviting women after 10 years if they test HPV-negative. Stratification for HPV vaccination status does not improve the cost-effectiveness of screening.