Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41657014›Full record

ArticleJournal of the experimental analysis of behavior2026

Divided control by past behavior, present stimuli, and future outcome value in a concurrent-chains procedure.

Stephanie Gomes-Ng, Tess Austin, John Y H Bai, Jason Landon, Sarah Cowie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Stephanie Gomes-NgAuckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.
Tess AustinAuckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.
John Y H BaiUniversity of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Jason LandonAuckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.
Sarah CowieThe University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3667-0319

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When multiple stimuli appear to signal behavior-reinforcer contingencies, control may be divided between those stimuli. Such divided stimulus control depends in part on the value of the outcome to the organism, with stimuli signaling more valuable outcomes exerting stronger control. The present experiment investigated how divided control by past and present stimuli interacts with outcome value. Pigeons responded in a concurrent-chains procedure in which one terminal link ended with two food deliveries after 8 s and the other link ended with six food deliveries after 48 s. Outcomes were signaled by the response producing terminal-link entry (past behavior) as well as keylight stimuli during initial links (past signals) and terminal links (present signals). When these sources of stimulus control conflicted, past behavior exerted strong control over terminal-link responding, overshadowing control by past signals. Some control by present signals was also evident, particularly at later times in terminal links. Additionally, stimuli signaling pigeons' more preferred outcome (smaller-sooner reinforcer) exerted stronger control than stimuli signaling the less preferred (larger-later) outcome. These findings highlight the importance of subjective outcome value in stimulus control and demonstrate that egocentric stimuli can exert enduring behavioral control even when other less transient discriminative stimuli occurred in the recent past or present.

Indexed as

Association LearningAnimalsChoice BehaviorColumbidaeConditioning, OperantOutcome ExpectationsReinforcement, PsychologyReinforcement Scheduleconflicting informationconsequence controlintertemporal choicepigeonstimulus control

Identifiers

PMID41657014
PMCPMC12884237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.