ArticleJournal of the experimental analysis of behavior2026
Divided control by past behavior, present stimuli, and future outcome value in a concurrent-chains procedure.
Article in Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Divided control by past behavior, present stimuli, and future outcome value in a concurrent-chains procedure.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
When multiple stimuli appear to signal behavior-reinforcer contingencies, control may be divided between those stimuli. Such divided stimulus control depends in part on the value of the outcome to the organism, with stimuli signaling more valuable outcomes exerting stronger control. The present experiment investigated how divided control by past and present stimuli interacts with outcome value. Pigeons responded in a concurrent-chains procedure in which one terminal link ended with two food deliveries after 8 s and the other link ended with six food deliveries after 48 s. Outcomes were signaled by the response producing terminal-link entry (past behavior) as well as keylight stimuli during initial links (past signals) and terminal links (present signals). When these sources of stimulus control conflicted, past behavior exerted strong control over terminal-link responding, overshadowing control by past signals. Some control by present signals was also evident, particularly at later times in terminal links. Additionally, stimuli signaling pigeons' more preferred outcome (smaller-sooner reinforcer) exerted stronger control than stimuli signaling the less preferred (larger-later) outcome. These findings highlight the importance of subjective outcome value in stimulus control and demonstrate that egocentric stimuli can exert enduring behavioral control even when other less transient discriminative stimuli occurred in the recent past or present.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.