ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2026
Beyond the Leaderboard: Evaluating the Robustness of Deep Learning Models for Detecting Freezing of Gait.
Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of continuous subcutaneous foslevodopa/foscarbidopa infusion on gait in advanced Parkinson's disease: a real-world wearable-based study.Journal of neurology · 2026Article
- Walking as a Window to the Brain: Redefining Gait in Neurology.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Beyond the Leaderboard: Evaluating the Robustness of Deep Learning Models for Detecting Freezing of Gait.The European journal of neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Freezing of gait is a common, debilitating symptom that affects many patients with Parkinson's disease. The lack of a standard, objective method to quantify freezing obstructs research and treatment. Wearable sensors combined with automatic detection algorithms have demonstrated increasingly promising results; nonetheless, video annotation remains the gold standard. After organizing a global machine learning contest to expedite the development of acceleration-based algorithms designed to automatically detect freezing, we tested the transferability of the winning models to a new dataset. Experts reviewed and annotated a test protocol conducted and videotaped in the homes of 12 patients. The models were applied to acceleration data from a lower back sensor worn by the patients. F1-scores, accuracy, recall, specificity, and precision were computed. Intraclass correlations quantified the agreement between model-estimated and annotation-based gold standard outcomes, including the percent time frozen, the number of episodes, and the total freezing duration. While there was a relatively large drop in performance for some of the models, the performance of the third place model showed good transferability to new data. Indeed, the agreement between the third place model and gold standard annotations was similar to or better than that seen when comparing two raters. These results further support the idea that if the goal is to detect freezing duration or percent time frozen, the combination of a single, lower back sensor and the third place model can be used to automatically detect freezing. Still, if the goal is to count episodes or detect freezing subtypes, additional sensors or other modelling approaches are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.