Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41657009›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2026

Beyond the Leaderboard: Evaluating the Robustness of Deep Learning Models for Detecting Freezing of Gait.

Amit Salomon, Eran Gazit, Nathaniel Shimoni, Lior Nisimov, Talia Herman, Valeri Sandler, Jeffrey M Hausdorff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Walking as a Window to the Brain: Redefining Gait in Neurology.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Amit SalomonCenter for the Study of Movement, Cognition and Mobility, Neurological Institute, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Eran GazitCenter for the Study of Movement, Cognition and Mobility, Neurological Institute, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Nathaniel ShimoniDatadudes AI, Beer Sheva, Israel.
Lior NisimovBen Gurion University, Beer Sheva, Israel.
Talia HermanCenter for the Study of Movement, Cognition and Mobility, Neurological Institute, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Valeri SandlerSchool of Graduate Studies, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Jeffrey M HausdorffCenter for the Study of Movement, Cognition and Mobility, Neurological Institute, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-1608-0776

Funding

Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research MJFF-023293
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Freezing of gait is a common, debilitating symptom that affects many patients with Parkinson's disease. The lack of a standard, objective method to quantify freezing obstructs research and treatment. Wearable sensors combined with automatic detection algorithms have demonstrated increasingly promising results; nonetheless, video annotation remains the gold standard. After organizing a global machine learning contest to expedite the development of acceleration-based algorithms designed to automatically detect freezing, we tested the transferability of the winning models to a new dataset. Experts reviewed and annotated a test protocol conducted and videotaped in the homes of 12 patients. The models were applied to acceleration data from a lower back sensor worn by the patients. F1-scores, accuracy, recall, specificity, and precision were computed. Intraclass correlations quantified the agreement between model-estimated and annotation-based gold standard outcomes, including the percent time frozen, the number of episodes, and the total freezing duration. While there was a relatively large drop in performance for some of the models, the performance of the third place model showed good transferability to new data. Indeed, the agreement between the third place model and gold standard annotations was similar to or better than that seen when comparing two raters. These results further support the idea that if the goal is to detect freezing duration or percent time frozen, the combination of a single, lower back sensor and the third place model can be used to automatically detect freezing. Still, if the goal is to count episodes or detect freezing subtypes, additional sensors or other modelling approaches are needed.

Indexed as

Deep LearningGait Disorders, NeurologicParkinson DiseaseGaitHumansIMUsmachine learningParkinson's diseasewearables

Identifiers

PMID41657009
PMCPMC12884249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.