Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41656964›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of caring sciences2026

How Nurses Communicate About Amputation and Death in Specialised Outpatient Wound Clinics-A Qualitative Study.

Emma Sandberg Nautrup, Kristoffer Marsaa, Heidi Bergenholtz, Ulla Riis Madsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of caring sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emma Sandberg NautrupUniversity of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Kristoffer MarsaaSteno Diabetes Centre Copenhagen, Herlev, Graested, Denmark.
Heidi BergenholtzZealand University Hospital, Research Support Unit & REHPA, the Danish Knowledge Centre for Rehabilitation and Palliative Care, Odense University Hospital and Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Ulla Riis MadsenVascular Surgery Department, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde; Orthopaedic Department, Holbaek Hospital & REHPA, the Danish Knowledge Centre for Rehabilitation and Palliative Care, Odense University Hospital & Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9436-6887

Funding

Novo Nordisk Fonden NNF18OC0051995 in the call 'Postdoc Fellowships in Nursing Research'Steno Diabetes Center Zealand
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo explore how nurses communicate with patients at risk of amputation due to chronic leg wounds, with a specific focus on discussions regarding amputation and death and to explore the perceived barriers that nurses face when engaging in conversations about prognosis, treatment options and end-of-life care.

methodsAn exploratory qualitative design was employed, utilising non-participant observations and focus group interviews conducted in specialist wound clinics across four hospitals in Denmark. The observations included 85 consultations involving 84 patients with chronic leg wounds, and four focus group interviews were conducted with 13 registered nurses. Data analysis followed a qualitative content analysis procedure and is reported according to the COREQ guidelines.

findingsThe study revealed that the primary goal of nurses is to achieve wound healing, which often overshadows the need for discussions about amputation and death. Five key themes emerged: 'Professional responsibility shaped by emotional involvement'; 'Meeting patients with honesty rather than compassion'; 'Avoiding conversations about amputation and death'; 'Timing dilemmas in conversations about amputation and death'; and 'Biomedical confidence and psychosocial uncertainty'. Nurses expressed a desire for deeper conversations but felt constrained by institutional practices and personal beliefs.

conclusionsThis study highlights the critical need for a systematic approach to communication about amputation and end-of-life care in chronic wound management. By identifying barriers and emphasising the importance of holistic, patient-centred care, the findings contribute to the ongoing discourse on improving palliative care practices for patients with chronic wounds. The insights gained can inform training and guidelines to enhance nurses' competencies and foster more open discussions about difficult topics, ultimately improving patient outcomes and quality of life. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE: Several barriers hinder nurses from discussing amputation and death with patients, including perceived incompetence, time constraints, lack of systematic approaches, unclear roles among healthcare professionals, and personal beliefs. The strong emphasis on achieving wound healing can overshadow the need for compassionate discussions about potential amputation, the broader implications of living with chronic wounds, and the risk of dying. Nurses often prioritise the practical tasks around wound healing over holistic patient care, which can lead to neglecting important conversations about prognosis and end-of-life care.

Indexed as

Amputation, SurgicalCommunicationNurse-Patient RelationsAdultAgedDenmarkFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative Researchadvanced care planningcommunicationpalliative wound carewound care

Identifiers

PMID41656964
PMCPMC12903833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.