ArticleEuropean journal of public health2026
Assessing the return-to-work mode of precarious workers with mental health issues: reliability, validity, and usability of the REMODE-tool.
Article in European journal of public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mental health issues are highly prevalent among precarious workers, often leading to prolonged sickness absence and unemployment. A worker's perceptions and attitudes about return-to-work are important determinants of work resumption and can be categorized into three modes: an expectant, an ambivalent-uncertain, and an active return-to-work mode. To support professionals in identifying these modes, we developed the REturn-to-work MODe Evaluation (REMODE) tool. This study evaluated REMODE's inter-rater agreement, inter-item consistency, content validity, and usability. In a vignette study, 71 occupational health professionals from a Dutch social security institute viewed six videos of consultations between insurance physicians and precarious workers. They then used REMODE to assess the worker's return-to-work mode and need for occupational support. Participants also rated REMODE's validity and usability with 5-point Likert scale questions based on the Content Validity Index and System Usability Scale. We used a generalized linear mixed model to analyse inter-rater agreement and inter-item consistency. The professionals highly agreed on the REMODE-score [ICC 0.87 (95% CI 0.63-0.97)] and corresponding return-to-work mode [ICC 0.83 (0.54-0.95), Κω 0.75 (0.74-0.75)]. Their agreement on need for occupational support was moderate [ICC 0.65 (0.30-0.89), Κω 0.57 (0.56-0.57)]. REMODE's internal consistency demonstrated excellence (Cronbach's alpha 0.92), and the content validity index (0.83) and system usability scale (76) were acceptable. REMODE is a promising tool for occupational health professionals as it supports identification of the return-to-work mode of precarious workers with mental health issues. We propose a refined version of RE-MODE for use in occupational healthcare and research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.