ArticleVirulence2026
Machine learning prediction of functional cure to pegylated interferon-alpha therapy in two HBV populations: Advantaged populations and HBeAg-negative patients.
Article in Virulence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Machine Learning-Enhanced MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry for Screening HBsAg-Positive Patients.Microorganisms · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite advances in antiviral therapy, the rate of functional cure for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) remains unsatisfactory, and developing an applicable prediction model is pivotal to improving it. Thus, we aimed to identify key predictive factors and develop prognostic models for functional cure in HBeAg-negative patients and the advantaged populations. This retrospective study included 202 HBeAg-negative CHB patients (114 classified as advantaged populations) receiving pegylated interferon-alpha (PEG-IFNα) therapy for model derivation and internal validation, and 183 HBeAg-negative CHB patients (117 classified as advantaged populations) for model external validation. Using 48 routinely collected clinical indicators, we constructed prediction models through LASSO regression followed by multivariable logistic regression. Two nomogram-based models were developed: the SHAN model, based on four independent predictors - ln (HBsAg +1), age, neutrophil percentage (NE%), and sex - was tailored for HBeAg-negative patients. For the advantaged populations, two additional variables - alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) - were incorporated into the FLASH-N model. Both models demonstrated strong discrimination, with AUCs of 0.908 in the training set and 0.949 in the test set for the SHAN model and an AUC of 0.920 (bootstrap-corrected to 0.889) for the FLASH-N model in the advantaged populations. In external validation, SHAN model achieved an AUC of 0.861, and FLASH-N achieved an AUC of 0.800. Calibration plots and decision curve analysis further confirmed the robustness, accuracy, and clinical utility of both nomograms. By leveraging routinely available baseline variables, these models offer powerful tools for predicting functional cure in CHB, enabling refined risk stratification and more personalized clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.