ArticleJournal of hospital medicine2026
Incidence, contributing factors, and predictors of diagnostic errors in medical inpatients: A retrospective cohort study.
Article in Journal of hospital medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reply to: "In Reference to: 'Incidence, contributing factors, and predictors of diagnostic errors in medical inpatients: A retrospective cohort study'".Journal of hospital medicine · 2026Article
- In Reference to: "Incidence, contributing factors, and predictors of diagnostic errors in medical inpatients: A retrospective cohort study".Journal of hospital medicine · 2026Article
- Incidence, contributing factors, and predictors of diagnostic errors in medical inpatients: A retrospective cohort study.Journal of hospital medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDiagnostic error is a major patient safety concern in hospitals, yet most studies have focused on selected high-risk subgroups, leaving the broader general internal medicine inpatient population understudied.
objectivesTo determine the incidence, contributing factors, resulting harm, and predictors of diagnostic error in medical inpatients.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study included adults admitted to internal medicine between 01/2022 and 12/2022 at one tertiary and 4 secondary care hospitals in Switzerland. Retrieved admissions were randomly ordered, and electronic medical records were reviewed sequentially by two clinicians using standardized instruments, until reaching a pre-specified target threshold of 50 patients with ≥1 diagnostic error, enabling analysis of five predictors. The primary outcome was the occurrence of a diagnostic error. The secondary outcome was the resulting level of harm. Five pre-specified predictors were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression.
resultsOf 347 patients (median age 73 [interquartile range, 61-81] years; 140 [40.3%] female), 52 (15%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 11.6%-19.1%) experienced ≥1 diagnostic error, causing harm in 43/52 patients (82.7%; 95% CI 70.3%-90.6%). The most common contributing factors were failures to consider the correct diagnosis (40/52, 76.9%), order appropriate tests (31/52, 59.6%), and act on critical physical exam findings (30/52, 57.7%). Neurocognitive/psychiatric disorders (odds ratio [OR], 2.20; 95% CI, 1.20-4.10) and active cancer (OR, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.01-4.20) independently predicted diagnostic error.
conclusionsDiagnostic error is common among adult medical inpatients and causes harm. We identified neurocognitive/psychiatric disorders and active cancer as patient-level predictors of diagnostic error, providing a basis for future studies on targeted interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.