ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2026
Attitudes to vaccine co-administration in adults: A scoping review of qualitative evidence.
Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring the experiences and perceptions of co-administration of routine vaccines in adults: Findings from an embedded qualitative study with participants and research delivery staff in the ZosterFluCov randomized controlled trial.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2026Trial
- Real-World Utilization of the Novavax Adjuvanted Recombinant Protein COVID-19 Vaccine in France During the 2022-2024 Period.Vaccines · 2026Article
- Vaccine Coadministration in Primary Care: A KAP Survey Among General Practitioners in Southern Italy.Vaccines · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Providing multiple vaccinations to adults at a single appointment, known as co-administration, could help increase vaccine coverage by making the process more convenient for the public. Despite vaccine co-administration policies, there are many missed opportunities to offer multiple vaccines. A qualitative understanding of the public attitude to co-administration may allow the development of interventions to increase implementation of co-administration policies. We undertook a scoping review following the Joanna Briggs Institute framework to collate the available qualitative literature to identify barriers, and facilitators to vaccine co-administration as well as potential research gaps. We created and used an iterative search strategy to retrieve articles published between 1/10/2010 and 11/12/2024 in three scientific databases. None of the articles retrieved fulfilled the inclusion criteria. There were nine articlesthat used quantitative surveys to measure attitudes, barriers and facilitators. Qualitative studies to understand barriers and facilitators to vaccine co-administration are needed to inform future policy implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.