Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41656805›Full record

ArticleZhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences2025

[Application of large language models in health education for patients with pediatric cataract].

Yuyu Guo, Yue Zhang, Yanhui Xu, Wei Wei, Keqing Meng, Yumeng Chen, Zhimin Chen

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yuyu GuoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050017. 1642520193@qq.com.
Yue ZhangHebei Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Hebei Provincial Clinical Research Center for Eye Diseases, Xingtai 054001, China.
Yanhui XuHebei Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Hebei Provincial Clinical Research Center for Eye Diseases, Xingtai 054001, China.
Wei WeiHebei Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Hebei Provincial Clinical Research Center for Eye Diseases, Xingtai 054001, China.
Keqing MengHebei Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Hebei Provincial Clinical Research Center for Eye Diseases, Xingtai 054001, China.
Yumeng ChenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050017.
Zhimin ChenHebei Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Hebei Provincial Clinical Research Center for Eye Diseases, Xingtai 054001, China. ykyyczm@126.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPediatric cataract occurs during the critical period of visual development, and early intervention is essential to avoid irreversible visual impairment. The health literacy and self-management ability of children and their parents directly affect treatment adherence and prognosis. With the rapid development of artificial intelligence, this study aims to evaluate the accuracy, completeness, and repeatability of domestic open-source large language model (LLM) in answering common clinical questions from pediatric cataract patients, and to explore their application potential as an online health information resource tool for pediatric cataract patients.

methodsThe research team collected real patient questions from mainstream online medical platforms since 2016, and categorized them into 5 major domains: Risk factors, disease diagnosis, symptoms and staging, screening and examinations, treatment and prognosis. After expert review, 40 high-attention questions were finalized and manual reference answers were provided by experts. Four domestic open-source LLM (Kimi chat, Doubao, ERNIE Bot 3.5, DeepSeek) were selected. Each question was asked repeatedly 4 times, including 2 times with a "patient-physician" role prompt. Three cataract specialists with the title of associate chief physician or above scored the answers blindly using a 4-level accuracy scale, 3-level completeness scale, and 3-level reproducibility scale. The evaluation followed a two-stage assessment scheme: Stage 1 preliminarily tested the 4 LLM using 6 questions of recognized lower difficulty; Stage 2 performed a full evaluation of all 40 questions on the highest-scoring LLM from Stage 1.

resultsIn the first stage of evaluation, regardless of whether role prompts were included, among the 4 LLM, Kimi chat performed the best, followed by Doubao and ERNIE Bot 3.5, and finally DeepSeek. In Stage 1, regardless of role prompting, Kimi chat performed best, followed by Doubao and ERNIE Bot 3.5, with DeepSeek ranking last. The proportion of answers from Kimi chat scoring accuracy=4, completeness=3, and reproducibility=3 was higher than Doubao, ERNIE Bot 3.5, and DeepSeek. In Stage 2, Kimi chat completed all 40 questions. Its median answer length was 531 (277, 1 059) words, significantly higher than the manual reference 369 (162, 707) words (

conclusionsDomestic open-source LLM, especially Kimi chat, demonstrated relatively good performance in pediatric cataract health education scenarios, providing medical information with good accuracy, completeness, and reproducibility for parents. LLM have great potential in the healthcare field, but information security, hallucination, and bias remain key challenges, and they still cannot replace clinical physicians. In the future, LLM are expected to collaborate with physicians to deliver more efficient and personalized medical services and promote the development of healthcare.

Indexed as

CataractHealth EducationLarge Language ModelsPatient Education as TopicArtificial IntelligenceChildHealth LiteracyHumansReproducibility of Resultsdisease prognosishealth consultationlarge language modelmedical artificial intelligencepediatric cataract

Identifiers

PMID41656805
PMCPMC12949873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.